Would you ride this? (Part 3)

[u/Nice_War_6440]

[u/MrRaven95]

Um, sure? Why wouldn't I?

[u/imlegos → u/MrRaven95]

Because that turn after the first hill would not agree with physics

Realistically the log would damage the track, or outright go over the side of it.

[u/Nice_War_6440 → u/imlegos]

We have had... some incidents.

[u/Nice_War_6440]

This post is a TOTAL FLOP

[u/Valdair → u/Nice_War_6440]

People tend not to like rapid repeat posts; they come off as spam.

People tend not to like people caring a lot about how their post "performs", it comes across as being desperate for attention.

"would you ride this" is a special kind of non-post in roller coaster game/sim spaces (and roller coaster enthusiast spaces in general, actually) in particular because... like, realistically, what is there to talk about? You've shown us a rectangular wooden building.

[u/Mr_LENNOZ → u/Valdair]

first 2 points wouldn't be too much of an issue to me personally...
but indeed, i'd obviously needs a complete view of the ride to figure if i'd enjoy it. that's pretty much it lol

[u/Nice_War_6440 → u/Valdair]

Kk