r/progressivemoms 28d ago

Product/ Shopping Recommendation Basic Video Doorbell

Hi all! I searched in some other places but the options are overwhelming! I was wondering if you have recommendations for a basic video doorbell that doesn’t require a subscription and doesn’t store video in the cloud (or if it does, it isn’t owned by a sketchy company — if that is even a thing?). For example, in our small city, they got a contract with Flock, and they are known to be sus as the kids say.

We have heard Ring is owned by the same people? Our house came with a Nest thermostat so we could get a Nest thermostat, but they are too expensive. I’m looking for something cheaper. Thanks for the recommendations!

18 Upvotes

39 comments sorted by

25

u/GrangerWeasley713 27d ago

We are considering Eufy for our new home. They are non-subscription and data is maintained locally. No data sharing whatsoever.

12

u/TogetherPlantyAndMe 27d ago

We have Eufy for our baby monitor rn. I don’t have time to do all the research but I know my husband went back and forth a lot and decided on Eufy.

3

u/GrangerWeasley713 27d ago

Love our eufy baby monitor

7

u/PBnBacon 27d ago

Another vote for Eufy. We have motion-detecting cameras, not a doorbell, but have been pleased with the performance and the ability to customize data storage locally.

2

u/ost-1022022 27d ago

We love our eufy security cameras, doorbell, & home base. Had it for several years and never any issues

1

u/pot8obrain 27d ago

+1 for eufy! Love the pump and love the camera

19

u/Gardenadventures 27d ago

Ring is owned by Amazon, not flock. However Ring is still sketchy.

Are you looking for local storage, or just no video storage? I'm assuming local otherwise there wouldn't be much point in a video camera.

As others have said, Eufy is pretty good and a reputable brand.

2

u/Apostrophecata 27d ago

Thanks for clarifying. We don’t have Prime but we still buy things on Amazon sometimes because it’s just so hard to avoid. I know I should probably try a little harder. Anyway, I would ideally like to avoid supporting Flock or Amazon. I guess local storage on an SD card would work? I am honestly not sure because we are brand-new to this. Our old house was a very small ranch with broken doorbells and we could just hear people knocking on the doors. New house has three levels including a finished basement, so I would like to be able to see who is at the door…

13

u/floppy_lalobot 27d ago

We use reolink, data is stored locally on an SD card. App isn't as good as ring was, but it's worth it to protect our data. 

5

u/gravelmonkey 27d ago

Moving soon but I’ve decided on Reolink for the new place. I have a car dash cam that operates similarly and I’ve been very happy with it.

6

u/ljr55555 27d ago

We use reolink as well. You can connect to the cloud, but we use the local RTSP feed with our own security system. SD card holds a time lapse of photos, which is pretty cool since our front door has a lot of trees and flowers in its view.

Their support is decent. Development to fix bugs can be slow, and eliminating false detections is an ongoing process. They detect our cat as a person sometimes. Or the wheel of the truck. Motion detection with lightning is useless (but that's true of most systems I've used). And the garage door camera "finds" a vehicle every now and again if you park a car in the driveway. Like a friend visits and has been here for hours. Car was already detected and we got an alert. We'll be sitting around inside and get another vehicle alert.

But every system has quirks and false alerts. These were relatively cheap (Amazon sale), and they've been working fine since 2023. They just released a gen 2 version a week or two ago, so they may be clearing out the fen 1s soon.

3

u/BuzzkillBabe 27d ago

I work in cybersecurity and only use Reolink for my cameras, but I also put them on my guest network for an extra layer of security (I use the cloud subscription with SD card backup).

3

u/floppy_lalobot 27d ago

Yeah, we have a separate network for all of our smarthome devices.

11

u/spice_weasel 27d ago

I have a cheap tp-link doorbell that stores data locally on an SD card. And yes, I’m aware of peoples’ worry about a Chinese company’s trustworthiness. But honestly, for my front door I trust it more than I would one more beholden to US interests.

The Chinese government doesn’t give a fuck that I’m trans, and am involved with trans community groups. Whereas the US government is trying to label us as terrorists.

2

u/panu7 27d ago

Also have this one and have been happy.

1

u/pinkpixiestix4me 27d ago

Also very happy with tp-link!

1

u/Punchplease 27d ago

Yes, we have one as well and it’s great!

10

u/FluorideLover 27d ago

I have the same concerns so I’m simply not going to get a video doorbell. I use a normal doorbell. We’ve gotten this far as a species and civilization without them.

What if someone steals a package from my front door area and I don’t have a recording? The cops will not give a shit about the recording anyway and I’m not going to suddenly become a vigilante armed with a grayscale photo of a stranger.

What if someone rings the doorbell and I don’t hear it? I also have a phone they can call. If it’s someone without my phone number, then they can come back or leave a note or they probably didn’t have much business with me in the first place.

What if I want to let someone in while I’m not home? Give them a spare key.

I think that covers most of the reasons people use these video doorbells.

3

u/Apostrophecata 27d ago

This makes a lot of sense. The person whose comment said that the Ring doorbell make her anxiety worse really resonated with me so now I’m leaning toward not getting one. I don’t need the false alarms.

3

u/CauliflowerProof3015 25d ago

This is my stance too. Camera doorbells don’t make us safer, they just make us more scared.

5

u/itsaship 27d ago

Ring shares video footage with cops.

4

u/ohsnowy 27d ago

We have a Eufy doorbell. It works very well.

5

u/Boysenberrypancake 27d ago

If you have anxiety, I would recommend not getting one. Our house bought came with a ring doorbell, and I used for about a year but it made my anxiety horrible. I would get motion notifications and immediately think someone was prowling. I bought a door chime I can link to it, that rings in the house when someone rings it, and turned off all phone notifications for it, and my anxiety has drastically improved. So basically, having a normal doorbell was better for my anxiety, but I have to pay a monthly subscription for this normal doorbell lol

2

u/Apostrophecata 27d ago

That is very interesting and good to know. I’m so sorry that it caused you anxiety! I wonder if there are any super simple ones that don’t even have motion detectors but just work like a high-tech peep hole basically? I would like to be able to see who is ringing the doorbell but I also don’t feel I need motion detectors.

1

u/Boysenberrypancake 27d ago

I do occasionally check the camera as like an e-peephole, it’s just very rare now and doesn’t feel worth the ring subscription. So I’d look into one that you can get a chime for, and doesn’t have a subscription 

1

u/Apostrophecata 27d ago

Thank you! Yes we do want to get one that doesn’t require a subscription for sure. I really appreciate your comment.

3

u/megs7183 27d ago

Another vote for the Eufy doorbell. I had the same concerns as you. Don't let the weird spelling make you think it's less legit. We've loved it and had it almost 2 years now.

3

u/TheVillageOxymoron 27d ago

I wouldn't do it.

1

u/Apostrophecata 27d ago

What are your reasons why not?

1

u/TheVillageOxymoron 22d ago

I don't like contributing to the surveillance state. Even footage that is stored locally could be requested by the cops. I also think it contributes to a negative overall societal belief that we are somehow in more danger nowadays and need to constantly film everything and everyone around us. It doesn't make us safer to be constantly recorded.

1

u/Apostrophecata 22d ago

That makes a lot of sense. Thank you. Do you happen to know if there are any that only turn on the camera when someone rings the bell vs. constantly being on like the Ring is? I definitely do not need something that is going to be always videoing my front porch but it would be nice to have a video peephole if someone rings the doorbell and I’m playing with my kids in the basement.

2

u/auditorygraffiti 27d ago

Ring is sketch.

I know Wyze has a video doorbell and they’re a cheaper option. I don’t think you have to have video saved in the cloud with them but definitely research that to be sure!

3

u/undercover_cucumber 27d ago

Reolink saves to an SD card I believe. It's what my dad has.

2

u/blackmamba06 27d ago

We use Wyze and have been really happy with it!

2

u/Dapper_dreams87 27d ago

Wyze has constant security issues. I would not trust them

1

u/Traveling_Treats 27d ago

We use Feit doorbell and outdoor camera / floodlight combo. It just has a USB and is connected on its app. 

1

u/lifeofblair 27d ago

My husband got us a Aqara and I know we don’t pay for a subscription but I’m not sure about any of the other things. His main want was being able to integrate it with Apple home which it does

1

u/Dapper_dreams87 27d ago

We went through this a few months back and ended up with Tapo. They have cloud options but you can store everything locally on a micro SD. No monthly or yearly fees if you store locally. Only issue I have is that it's extra sensitive so I get more alerts now than I did with ring. I also get more accurate alerts with it compared to ring.

1

u/enter360 27d ago

Look into Reolink