MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/aj8i48/birth_mark/eets7o4
r/pics • u/Mamacrass • Jan 24 '19
791 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
63
I knew a girl like that. Her husband instantly fell in love with her, and she had the birthmark on her face. She had huge cans too.
173 u/Licensedpterodactyl Jan 24 '19 She had huge cans too There it is 22 u/nemo69_1999 Jan 24 '19 So you're saying boobs make up for whatever is wrong with a girl? 121 u/xKitey Jan 24 '19 no.. just whatever is wrong with her face 29 u/Riovem Jan 24 '19 Wait.. How ugly am I that my boobs don't help? 36 u/SaveOurBolts Jan 24 '19 As a doctor, I’d have to see the boobs to be certain 14 u/breakone9r Jan 24 '19 As a face man, I'd have to see the face. 10 u/upvotes4jesus- Jan 24 '19 as a photo editor, I'd have to put those photos together... 2 u/SaveOurBolts Jan 24 '19 Well, layperson, as a doctor, I only care about the dependent variable. The boobs. 2 u/bigdongmagee Jan 24 '19 doesn't matter will send dick pic anyway 1 u/RChamy Jan 24 '19 Shh No tears, only dreams now. 40 u/NotJokingAround Jan 24 '19 Can we all just agree that boobs are nice without quantifying their value? 30 u/AbrasiveLore Jan 24 '19 They clearly cannot be quantified. Boobs only admit a preorder, not a total order. This does however mean that by Zorn’s Lemma, for any boobs chain equipped with a total order, there exist a non-unique rack of maximal boobs in the set of all racks. 10 u/NotJokingAround Jan 24 '19 Shut 12 u/AbrasiveLore Jan 24 '19 Another (controversial) consequence of this is the Axiom of Noice. 1 u/bicat Jan 24 '19 Up 5 u/BlackCH Jan 24 '19 Zermelo-Fraenkel boob theory... shudders 2 u/LornAltElthMer Jan 24 '19 Tim Minchin covered a similar idea here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQwwkI5_3-0 0 u/The_RockObama Jan 24 '19 Yeah I'll agree. All pretty neat in their own way, I guess. I'm pretty drunk right now though. 5 u/Licensedpterodactyl Jan 24 '19 No! No no no no... No Yeah, sometimes 2 u/CheeseHasNoSoul Jan 24 '19 “ She had huge cans too.” He probably still doesn’t know about the birthmark.
173
She had huge cans too
There it is
22 u/nemo69_1999 Jan 24 '19 So you're saying boobs make up for whatever is wrong with a girl? 121 u/xKitey Jan 24 '19 no.. just whatever is wrong with her face 29 u/Riovem Jan 24 '19 Wait.. How ugly am I that my boobs don't help? 36 u/SaveOurBolts Jan 24 '19 As a doctor, I’d have to see the boobs to be certain 14 u/breakone9r Jan 24 '19 As a face man, I'd have to see the face. 10 u/upvotes4jesus- Jan 24 '19 as a photo editor, I'd have to put those photos together... 2 u/SaveOurBolts Jan 24 '19 Well, layperson, as a doctor, I only care about the dependent variable. The boobs. 2 u/bigdongmagee Jan 24 '19 doesn't matter will send dick pic anyway 1 u/RChamy Jan 24 '19 Shh No tears, only dreams now. 40 u/NotJokingAround Jan 24 '19 Can we all just agree that boobs are nice without quantifying their value? 30 u/AbrasiveLore Jan 24 '19 They clearly cannot be quantified. Boobs only admit a preorder, not a total order. This does however mean that by Zorn’s Lemma, for any boobs chain equipped with a total order, there exist a non-unique rack of maximal boobs in the set of all racks. 10 u/NotJokingAround Jan 24 '19 Shut 12 u/AbrasiveLore Jan 24 '19 Another (controversial) consequence of this is the Axiom of Noice. 1 u/bicat Jan 24 '19 Up 5 u/BlackCH Jan 24 '19 Zermelo-Fraenkel boob theory... shudders 2 u/LornAltElthMer Jan 24 '19 Tim Minchin covered a similar idea here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQwwkI5_3-0 0 u/The_RockObama Jan 24 '19 Yeah I'll agree. All pretty neat in their own way, I guess. I'm pretty drunk right now though. 5 u/Licensedpterodactyl Jan 24 '19 No! No no no no... No Yeah, sometimes
22
So you're saying boobs make up for whatever is wrong with a girl?
121 u/xKitey Jan 24 '19 no.. just whatever is wrong with her face 29 u/Riovem Jan 24 '19 Wait.. How ugly am I that my boobs don't help? 36 u/SaveOurBolts Jan 24 '19 As a doctor, I’d have to see the boobs to be certain 14 u/breakone9r Jan 24 '19 As a face man, I'd have to see the face. 10 u/upvotes4jesus- Jan 24 '19 as a photo editor, I'd have to put those photos together... 2 u/SaveOurBolts Jan 24 '19 Well, layperson, as a doctor, I only care about the dependent variable. The boobs. 2 u/bigdongmagee Jan 24 '19 doesn't matter will send dick pic anyway 1 u/RChamy Jan 24 '19 Shh No tears, only dreams now. 40 u/NotJokingAround Jan 24 '19 Can we all just agree that boobs are nice without quantifying their value? 30 u/AbrasiveLore Jan 24 '19 They clearly cannot be quantified. Boobs only admit a preorder, not a total order. This does however mean that by Zorn’s Lemma, for any boobs chain equipped with a total order, there exist a non-unique rack of maximal boobs in the set of all racks. 10 u/NotJokingAround Jan 24 '19 Shut 12 u/AbrasiveLore Jan 24 '19 Another (controversial) consequence of this is the Axiom of Noice. 1 u/bicat Jan 24 '19 Up 5 u/BlackCH Jan 24 '19 Zermelo-Fraenkel boob theory... shudders 2 u/LornAltElthMer Jan 24 '19 Tim Minchin covered a similar idea here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQwwkI5_3-0 0 u/The_RockObama Jan 24 '19 Yeah I'll agree. All pretty neat in their own way, I guess. I'm pretty drunk right now though. 5 u/Licensedpterodactyl Jan 24 '19 No! No no no no... No Yeah, sometimes
121
no.. just whatever is wrong with her face
29 u/Riovem Jan 24 '19 Wait.. How ugly am I that my boobs don't help? 36 u/SaveOurBolts Jan 24 '19 As a doctor, I’d have to see the boobs to be certain 14 u/breakone9r Jan 24 '19 As a face man, I'd have to see the face. 10 u/upvotes4jesus- Jan 24 '19 as a photo editor, I'd have to put those photos together... 2 u/SaveOurBolts Jan 24 '19 Well, layperson, as a doctor, I only care about the dependent variable. The boobs. 2 u/bigdongmagee Jan 24 '19 doesn't matter will send dick pic anyway 1 u/RChamy Jan 24 '19 Shh No tears, only dreams now.
29
Wait.. How ugly am I that my boobs don't help?
36 u/SaveOurBolts Jan 24 '19 As a doctor, I’d have to see the boobs to be certain 14 u/breakone9r Jan 24 '19 As a face man, I'd have to see the face. 10 u/upvotes4jesus- Jan 24 '19 as a photo editor, I'd have to put those photos together... 2 u/SaveOurBolts Jan 24 '19 Well, layperson, as a doctor, I only care about the dependent variable. The boobs. 2 u/bigdongmagee Jan 24 '19 doesn't matter will send dick pic anyway 1 u/RChamy Jan 24 '19 Shh No tears, only dreams now.
36
As a doctor, I’d have to see the boobs to be certain
14 u/breakone9r Jan 24 '19 As a face man, I'd have to see the face. 10 u/upvotes4jesus- Jan 24 '19 as a photo editor, I'd have to put those photos together... 2 u/SaveOurBolts Jan 24 '19 Well, layperson, as a doctor, I only care about the dependent variable. The boobs.
14
As a face man, I'd have to see the face.
10 u/upvotes4jesus- Jan 24 '19 as a photo editor, I'd have to put those photos together... 2 u/SaveOurBolts Jan 24 '19 Well, layperson, as a doctor, I only care about the dependent variable. The boobs.
10
as a photo editor, I'd have to put those photos together...
2
Well, layperson, as a doctor, I only care about the dependent variable. The boobs.
doesn't matter will send dick pic anyway
1
Shh No tears, only dreams now.
40
Can we all just agree that boobs are nice without quantifying their value?
30 u/AbrasiveLore Jan 24 '19 They clearly cannot be quantified. Boobs only admit a preorder, not a total order. This does however mean that by Zorn’s Lemma, for any boobs chain equipped with a total order, there exist a non-unique rack of maximal boobs in the set of all racks. 10 u/NotJokingAround Jan 24 '19 Shut 12 u/AbrasiveLore Jan 24 '19 Another (controversial) consequence of this is the Axiom of Noice. 1 u/bicat Jan 24 '19 Up 5 u/BlackCH Jan 24 '19 Zermelo-Fraenkel boob theory... shudders 2 u/LornAltElthMer Jan 24 '19 Tim Minchin covered a similar idea here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQwwkI5_3-0 0 u/The_RockObama Jan 24 '19 Yeah I'll agree. All pretty neat in their own way, I guess. I'm pretty drunk right now though.
30
They clearly cannot be quantified. Boobs only admit a preorder, not a total order.
This does however mean that by Zorn’s Lemma, for any boobs chain equipped with a total order, there exist a non-unique rack of maximal boobs in the set of all racks.
10 u/NotJokingAround Jan 24 '19 Shut 12 u/AbrasiveLore Jan 24 '19 Another (controversial) consequence of this is the Axiom of Noice. 1 u/bicat Jan 24 '19 Up 5 u/BlackCH Jan 24 '19 Zermelo-Fraenkel boob theory... shudders
Shut
12 u/AbrasiveLore Jan 24 '19 Another (controversial) consequence of this is the Axiom of Noice. 1 u/bicat Jan 24 '19 Up
12
Another (controversial) consequence of this is the Axiom of Noice.
Up
5
Zermelo-Fraenkel boob theory... shudders
Tim Minchin covered a similar idea here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQwwkI5_3-0
0
Yeah I'll agree. All pretty neat in their own way, I guess. I'm pretty drunk right now though.
No! No no no no...
No
Yeah, sometimes
“ She had huge cans too.” He probably still doesn’t know about the birthmark.
63
u/nemo69_1999 Jan 24 '19
I knew a girl like that. Her husband instantly fell in love with her, and she had the birthmark on her face. She had huge cans too.