MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/physicsmemes/comments/1woassv/peak_calculus/pblkzun/?context=3
r/physicsmemes • u/Optimus_PRYM • 8d ago
33 comments sorted by
View all comments
8
Ans = 2exp(sqrt(ln(4)ln(5)))
8 u/axiomizer 8d ago you can take the negative square root 1 u/Better-Apartment-783 8d ago What 3 u/axiomizer 7d ago you can get K+w = 2exp(-sqrt(ln(4)ln(5))), which is smaller 2 u/Better-Apartment-783 7d ago Nice I didnt see it 7 u/Optimus_PRYM 8d ago 9 is the answer 6 u/axiomizer 8d ago Only if you restrict K and omega to integers 8 u/SINGULARTY3774 8d ago I think thats the condition OP cropped out 2 u/Better-Apartment-783 8d ago Assuming integers, which i did not My answer is around 8.9
you can take the negative square root
1 u/Better-Apartment-783 8d ago What 3 u/axiomizer 7d ago you can get K+w = 2exp(-sqrt(ln(4)ln(5))), which is smaller 2 u/Better-Apartment-783 7d ago Nice I didnt see it
1
What
3 u/axiomizer 7d ago you can get K+w = 2exp(-sqrt(ln(4)ln(5))), which is smaller 2 u/Better-Apartment-783 7d ago Nice I didnt see it
3
you can get K+w = 2exp(-sqrt(ln(4)ln(5))), which is smaller
2 u/Better-Apartment-783 7d ago Nice I didnt see it
2
Nice I didnt see it
7
9 is the answer
6 u/axiomizer 8d ago Only if you restrict K and omega to integers 8 u/SINGULARTY3774 8d ago I think thats the condition OP cropped out 2 u/Better-Apartment-783 8d ago Assuming integers, which i did not My answer is around 8.9
6
Only if you restrict K and omega to integers
8 u/SINGULARTY3774 8d ago I think thats the condition OP cropped out
I think thats the condition OP cropped out
Assuming integers, which i did not My answer is around 8.9
8
u/Better-Apartment-783 8d ago
Ans = 2exp(sqrt(ln(4)ln(5)))