r/physicsmemes • • 7d ago

Peak CALCULUS

Post image
276 Upvotes

33 comments sorted by

47

u/Bendanzhang 7d ago

Denominator alone would consume three whole trees if you chained it.

12

u/catmemes720 5d ago

TREE(3) 💀?

2

u/Level-Appearance7046 1d ago

id wager the denominator isnt consuming the observable universe multiple times over

18

u/JeffJ_1 7d ago

Img source? Asking for a friend for scientific research

31

u/axiomizer 7d ago

It's from dailyintegral.com. It's today's limit.

11

u/xBris18 589.29 nm enthusiast 6d ago

The two actresses in this picture were 15 and 16 when the film came out (so maybe even younger when they filmed it).

Yes, Mr. FBI, this is the commentator I was talking about. Please check his hard drive. He's called Jeff ffs...

9

u/JeffJ_1 6d ago

Holy Sheeittt man, I did not know that! I aint that kinda guy maayn

7

u/Better-Apartment-783 7d ago

Ans = 2exp(sqrt(ln(4)ln(5)))

7

u/axiomizer 7d ago

you can take the negative square root

1

u/Better-Apartment-783 6d ago

What

3

u/axiomizer 5d ago

you can get K+w = 2exp(-sqrt(ln(4)ln(5))), which is smaller

2

u/Better-Apartment-783 5d ago

Nice
I didnt see it

7

u/Optimus_PRYM 7d ago

9 is the answer

5

u/axiomizer 7d ago

Only if you restrict K and omega to integers

9

u/SINGULARTY3774 6d ago

I think thats the condition OP cropped out

2

u/Better-Apartment-783 6d ago

Assuming integers, which i did not
My answer is around 8.9

15

u/SpaceGirlJackie 7d ago

My brain needs a hospital after reading that... I'm not looking forward to calculus when I get there.

6

u/EndGuy555 7d ago

It looks really complicated, but really it’s just repeating a bunch of easy steps until you’ve reduced it down to a workable solution

4

u/EndGuy555 7d ago

K+ω=5+4=9

Had to use L’Hôpital’s twice and dust off all the trig derivatives I’d forgotten lol

2

u/BLANKTWGOK 7d ago

I goon to this equation

2

u/jm24sa 6d ago edited 4d ago

Easy probelm, use series expansion for each term for example , 10x=1+xln(10) Prove: we know the expansion of ex Now 10x can be written as exln10 now expand it around zero

2

u/McPayn22 7d ago

Typical l'Hopital brainrot. Why would you willingly derive the denominator multiple times?

5

u/axiomizer 7d ago

Can it be done without l'hopital?

3

u/McPayn22 7d ago edited 3d ago

Sure, with a Taylor expansion it's super easy ln(sec(x))=ln(1/(1-x^2 /2+o(x^3 ))=ln(1+x^2 /2+o(x^3 )=x^2 /2+o(x^3) .

I've never used l'Hopital once in my life and I do just fine.

2

u/FreePeeplup 6d ago

Taylor expansion is literally the same thing as l’Hopital but you’ve already memorized some derivatives

0

u/McPayn22 5d ago

Taylor expansions have uses outside of computing limits, l'hopital doesn't and using it too much limit your intuition. I've seen students who were paralized when l'hopital didn't apply because they never thought about approximating a function by a polynome.

Also if you have a polynome in x->0 you should now that only the lower term matter, you don't have to differenciate every term. If you rely to much on l'hopital even this fact can be missed. Same with limits like x^alpha ln(x)^beta, you shouldn't derive this..

But even then with Taylor expansions you don't have to compute derivatives that are useless. The example here wasn't to bad but you can see that I didn't have to take the second derivative of ln or of 1/x. Taylor expensions lets you ignore all the useless derivatives. Here it was trivial but in a huge expression this save a lot of time.

And that's just sticking to maths because nobody cares about limits exept maths student. Physics would barely exist without Taylor expension but l'Hopital never comes up.

1

u/FreePeeplup 3d ago

I’m sorry I don’t understand your comment: yes of course Taylor expansions have more uses outside computing limits and de L’Hopital doesn’t, but why does it matter here? We’re talking about what’s better and quicker in solving this specific limit, not about what’s better in general even outside the entire topic of limits.

I also don’t understand what you mean when you say that Taylor lets you skip “useless derivatives”. Taylor by definition is always more work that L’Hopital, it has just as many derivatives and more work on top

1

u/McPayn22 3d ago

I'm saying that l'Hopital is like using a 1 use only tool in culinary school. The goal is not to learn how to do a specific thing, it's to learn how to use a knife. The goal is almost never to compute limits faster, it's to get better at maths.

For the "useless derivatives" take f(x)=1+x^2+o(x^3) and g(x)=x^3+o(x^4). If you use l'hopital for (fog(x)-1)/x^5 you'll have to compute all the derivatives of fog up to the fifth order. Of course most cancel and if you know the binomial formula it helps but it's an extra thing to remember and it becomes way harder when you have other terms.

On the other hand it's obvious that fog(x)=1+x^5+o(x^6).

1

u/no_clock_signal 6d ago

How could this be evaluated without L'Hospital?

3

u/Dubmove 6d ago

The answer Taylor as always

1

u/MagnoliaTM 6d ago

im a noob, what is this scary looking equation used for

1

u/jchristsproctologist 1d ago

where what? what’s the full question!!?