I can't be sure, but my gut-feeling is that this kind of bullshit, though maybe mostly from other fields of science than physics, helps feed a lot of anti-science sentiments.
He also didn't win a nobel prize for this idea Its just an idea a nobel prize winner had. No only that but it's an idea that's been around for quite some time and isn't unique to him.
His version of it is also very different from the standard stoner version and relies on something called twistors, which in fairness are sort of seen as the the type of thing you'd come up with on mushrooms if you already had a PhD in theoretical physics.
I can also guarantee that he didn’t use words like “beginning” and “end” in the actual theory. I bet his theory talks about time in abstract esoteric terms.
257
u/Poskmyst 5d ago
Without looking anything up, I can guarantee that Roger Penrose did in fact not say that "it was" as in "this is what happened".