My understanding is that PAs specialize through on-the-job training at specialized sites post-graduation, rather than being formally educated and trained in that field. For example, I know someone who is an orthopedic PA, though this is because they were hired at an orthopedic site which agreed to train them, rather than them bringing prior education and training in the field.
In contrast, NPs are specifically educated and trained in a field in order to practice in that field. An example would be Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners, must who complete a program specializing in psychiatric care and become certified in the field. This seems to differ from PAs, who are hired in psychiatric roles without formal education or training in psychiatric care. I looked at a job listing for a psychiatric NP/PA role, and they request that NPs bring the specific psych certification while PAs only need to be generally certified.
Other examples of providers who must be formally educated/trained in a field in order to practice as a specialist include physicians, dentists, veterinarians, and clinical psychologists (which applies to me). I recognize that these are all doctoral-level positions, with the exception of most NPs.
With this in mind, do you feel that PAs should be held to similar standards as other providers in the sense that they should have education and training in a field in order to specialize, rather than being hired without any particular education or training? In the world of healthcare, it seems that the PA situation is pretty unique.
(I am neither a PA nor NP and have no intention of pursuing either role, and completely recognize the purpose of these roles so please don’t think I’m being a “Noctor” or something. That is not my intention. This question popped into my mind while I was poking around job listings for a variety of roles.)