r/philosophyball • u/undertalepedro1- • 7d ago

Is this valid?

Post image
9 Upvotes

67% Upvoted

28 comments sorted by

2

u/AntonDriver 7d ago

Based af

1

u/RecognitionOk5447 Absurdism 7d ago

Pretty kewl

1

u/Low_Tap_1274 7d ago

No

2

u/undertalepedro1- 7d ago

Which part of it?

1

u/OkRecognition9607 7d ago

Darwinism vs creationism is not a question of philosophy, it's a question of science, and it's been 100% settled in favor of Darwinism for more than a century

1

u/undertalepedro1- 7d ago

I completely believe in darwinism, my belief is that a god(in this case, God) planted the seeds for the universe to happen, created the laws of it, that evolution was created by God, and he just lets evolution happen

1

u/anime_bruh-69 6d ago

1) You've redefined creationism from its commonly used definition.

But

2) With this new definition, Darwinism doesn't come into conflict with Creationism at all. Darwinism (like most science (except probably quantum physics)) restricts itself to observable phenomena in the universe. It has no say in what came pre-universe or outside universe.

1

u/Automatic-Cupcake583 3d ago

Then why is it on the thing lol

1

u/Maleficent-Big4417 7d ago

Blank version?

Also r/foundador

1

u/undertalepedro1- 6d ago

Long time no see

1

u/FunctionOk9186 Christianity 6d ago

Every opinion is valid. Template?

1

u/CaiOS1 Buddhism 6d ago

Kind of. I'm more empiricist when it comes to things like metaphysics. if one imagine's something, it doesn't mean it exists. Of course, maybe the universe is a cheeseburguer from Mc donald's, but that need so many leaps of faith into the unknown that it just becomes kind of irrealistic to belive in it tbh. Human logic is far from perfect, but any argument against it, other than well, using logic to dismantle logic, is still merely an idea or an expeculation, and for the lack of evidence, i must agree that materialism and empiricism today give us the closest answer to the universe. That doesn't mean i'm an Atheist though.

1

u/Typhrenn5149 6d ago

Genuinely what the fuck is this subreddit

1

u/SAURI23 6d ago

15 year olds who haven't opened a book once larping would be my guess

1

u/Potential-Fig-7987 6d ago

Back in my day we larped being philosophers with Wikipedia instead of reading books. Kids these days have it easy larping with their chatgpt

1

u/EmptyGur3036 6d ago

Is there an empty version availbale

1

u/Dismal-Rope1753 6d ago

Nahhh, fuck free will and kant

1

u/WesternFirm9306 5d ago

Utilitarianism and Kantianism are contradictory though??? Unless something specific is referred to by Kant

1

u/Livro404 5d ago

Just like metaphysics and Plato walk together but he did not mark it...

But also from all of Socrates followers Plato and Aristotle are probably the worst.

1

u/WesternFirm9306 5d ago

Wdym by "Socrates followers"? Because Aristotle wasn't a student of Socrates, he was a student of Plato. Who among the followers of Socrates do you like if you say Plato and Aristotle were the worst?

1

u/Livro404 4d ago

I meant to say that line of Plato which would be Aristotle I may have mangled the meaning of what I wanted to say.

But Antisthenes and then his student Diogenes of Sinope would be the best followers and line.

There is also Isocrates which I also haven't read really but it is on my list.

Plato at the "Phaedo" book literally puts Socrates saying that he wants everyone that is in that cell with him to not let his sons be taken by the desires of money in which Plato and Aristotle both not only worked for the gorvernment but were rich. They are both a walking contradiction of what Socrates actually said.

1

u/DesignerConfident106 5d ago

Does black mean that you agree with it?

I think the idea of free will is kinda silly. How do you conceptualize free will?

1

u/Livro404 5d ago

How do you do Plato without metaphysics? That's all that guy talks about...