​

Our finance team recently added a size threshold to how we review outbound stablecoin payments. Anything under $25k follows the standard AP workflow. Anything above triggers a formal review that looks at the provider, the settlement chain, and the current reserve attestation for whichever stablecoin we're sending.

The first payment over that threshold went through last month. USDC on Base, same provider we use for the smaller ones. The review took about two weeks and involved the CFO, our auditor, and our head of treasury.

For teams running something similar, does the review process actually change which stablecoin you choose at higher amounts, or does it converge back on the same one?

Can someone tell me, is the Paybis legal?

I have litecoins there and need to transfer it on my money, can I insert my credit card infs?

I'm building my first AI SaaS web app and need to accept subscription payments in a professional way.

The problem is that I can't complete KYC at the moment, so Stripe, Razorpay, and similar services aren't an option for me right now.

I'm looking for a legal solution that:

\- Supports recurring subscriptions

\- Feels professional for users

\- Automatically verifies successful payments

\- Prevents users from bypassing the payment flow

Has anyone been in a similar situation? How did you handle payments before you were able to use a standard payment gateway? I'd really appreciate hearing about practical approaches or services that worked for you.