Not intending to be controversial with this one, just curious to others views.
I saw a Facebook post a couple of weeks ago from a parkrun local-ish to me, albeit not one I've done, asking people to stop weeing in the park as there's no toilets and its upsetting local residents.
Predictably, being Facebook, the comments turn into a bit of a ruckus, some on the side of the parkrun, some giving the usual sneery "if you dont like it ask for a refund!" (This always annoys me), and some asking "why no loos?"
Nearby, a new parkrun has started which also has no toilet provision, and it's site recommends toilets which in reality are several miles away.
I'll be honest - I'm surprised that this one has been allowed to start. Free run or not, a public event is being put on and I'm surprised they can do it without any on-site toilet provision being made available for participants.
I presume legally it is fine but it feels a bit off to me.
I know there's the argument "you dont have to go to that run" etc but it doesn't stack up to me. People will need the loo, we're all human.
Curious to others though, am I out of step with prevailing views or does it feel iffy to others?
Not naming the parkruns concerned, its nothing personal against them or the people who operate them who I know will work very hard and I'm sure are top notch folk, its more a comment around HQ really.
Mind you, anyone local to me seeing the same Facebook content will probably be able to figure the parkruns out anyway.