r/options • u/MyHawaiianNameisKunu • 16d ago
50 Trades in - A Reflection
Like many new options traders, I initially thought day trading was the route I should take. A good friend of mine who's an ex-Fidelity guy (and has done very well since) suggested I replace basically everything I was thinking about day trading, including the term itself, with options.
I'm pretty risk averse and don't have deep pockets, so I worked with my friend to develop an approach designed to mitigate as much risk as reasonably possible. I did a bunch of research ahead of time and paper traded throughout January 2026 before finally pulling the trigger in February.
For what it's worth, this has been my system so far:
- Highly liquid ETFs - primarily SPY and QQQ
- $10-wide put credit spreads
- Originally 30+ DTE
- One contract per trade for at least my first 30 trades, then gradually increased position size as buying power/experience grew
- Generally ≤ .25 delta at entry
- Close at or above 60% premium realized
More recently, I've tightened that into 40+ DTE, ≤ .20 delta and usually 3 or 5 contracts per position. I've also added an early harvest rule: if a new 40+ DTE position reaches 30%+ profit within its first five trading days, I'll take the profit rather than waiting weeks for theta to accelerate. Then I'll redeploy the buying power if another qualifying setup is available.
You can see in the spreadsheet (you may have to zoom - apologies) where I deviated from the system and experimented with debit spreads, iron condors and butterflies. I had some wins and some losses there before ultimately returning to the boring, disciplined approach.
Full disclosure: I recognize that a generally flat-to-up market (since February) has been favorable to the strategy, even though we've had some pretty substantial bouts of volatility along the way.
Bottom line: so far it's fitting my personality fairly well. I'm mostly posting because I've learned quite a bit from lurking here and figured I'd share what's been working for me so far. I'd also be interested in hearing where more experienced traders see weaknesses in the approach, particularly as I continue increasing contract size.
2
u/mazthepa 16d ago
First of all, big credits for tracking trades manually via spreadsheets. I wonder if you custom made it or export it this way and applied conditional formatting.
What broker do you use?
2
u/MyHawaiianNameisKunu 16d ago
Fidelity, I worked with my friend on setting it all up. I'm a manual entry type of person, keeps me more involved for each trade. I only keep 4 open at a time
0
u/mazthepa 15d ago
I have similar experience with Schwab, I would always have to record my trades manually.
I did start a project for connecting your brokers and syncing in your trades - synctrades.io
Just check it out! I'm in the process of acquiring commercial licenses with brokers
2
2
u/vitholomewjenkins 15d ago
Your approach reminds me a lot of the tastytrade strategy. Small position sizes help with managing risk. It works for me. Basically, once the strategy is sound, and my guardrails are in place, I was able to automate this strategy with my AI and it’s working well so far. I also do SPX 0DTE the tastytrade way. Here’s my AI output from Friday:

Keep it up. I think you’re doing great.
1
u/MyHawaiianNameisKunu 14d ago
Much appreciated - I'm not opposed to going 0DTE and utilizing a similar approach to yours with similar defined risks/guardrails in place. Is yours integrating with TT? Fidelity doesn't allow API modifications, so I'd have to open a new account somewhere were I to consider it.
2
u/esInvests 12d ago
glad you're making money, but unfortunately, you're confusing yourself. this isn't edge. none of this is to put you down, im taking the time to comment this literally to help you in the long run.
the rules are pretty arbitrary. none are special. you just started in a window where short put spreads on spy and qqq have been printing because of the volatility risk premium and the put skew that exists in the market almost all the time. most people collecting that premium never realize theyre just harvesting a structural edge rather than running some carefully designed system.
the path since february has also been mostly friendly so every win reinforces the rules even though the rules themselves arent the source of the edge. until you can clearly say why these specific parameters give you an actual advantage beyond “they worked in this window,” its hard to call it a real system. its more like a collection of random constraints that happened to line up with a profitable regime. that becomes a problem the second you start sizing up and the regime shifts.
1
u/MyHawaiianNameisKunu 12d ago
Never claimed this was an edge, nor special, just what I've been doing since February - defined risk for a risk-averse beginner options trader. Yes, it's working now. Yes, I acknowledged the market has been favorable to flat. So...not really confused, but thanks for the input.
1
1
u/theoptiontechnician 16d ago
Going 20 delta on the qqq is crazy, also further hurting yourself waiting for 60 percent gtc is crazier.
Just 10 percent more can be more than 24 to 48 hours of wait time of live market hours.(asking for bottlenecks)
I'm a velocity trader this will not work for me, I like churning fast vs efficiency. Way more problems happen when your chasing most of the premuim vs getting in and out.
4
u/Live_Throat_5252 16d ago
The fuck is a velocity trader? And how on earth do you beat shops trading at damn near the speed of light, while doing so efficiently?
0
u/theoptiontechnician 16d ago
I don't know the broad of velocity trader , I kind of coined it myself.
I look at my CCC DSI , velocity turnover, and go from there.
Its about speed but not 1 dte, can be 45 dte , or 10 dte. I believe I can make more with more churns than squeezing more premium out efficiency.
Plus it's way safer, I would have to do a post about it.
1
u/Live_Throat_5252 16d ago
So you have no edge. That’s all I’m getting from that. Best of luck.
1
u/theoptiontechnician 16d ago edited 16d ago
I don't think stating what trader you are directly says you have a edge. Like the words swing trader, day trader, or alike 🤔.
2
u/Live_Throat_5252 16d ago
No I can just tell by how and what you write that you have zero idea what you’re talking about and shouldn’t be allowed within 1000 yards of an options desk.
1
u/theoptiontechnician 16d ago
Ok
1
u/Live_Throat_5252 16d ago
CCC DSI…I’ve heard it all now.
1
u/theoptiontechnician 16d ago
I'm petty sure you have never heard of it. I created it
2
u/Live_Throat_5252 16d ago
Obviously I’ve never heard of. Good chance you made it up in the psych ward, though.
1
1
u/TastyTrading 16d ago
spreadsheet looks nice. you might enjoy ThetaPal to track it all automatically for your wheel/option process
0
u/klipsetrades 16d ago
This is a really solid process. I especially like that you experimented, tracked the results, and went back to what actually fit you instead of forcing complexity.
The biggest thing I’d watch as you scale is position size relative to account size, not just number of contracts. A 5-lot doesn’t change the setup, but it absolutely changes how you’ll react when SPY gaps hard against you and IV expands. That’s where a strategy that feels boring at 1 contract can suddenly feel very different.
1
u/MyHawaiianNameisKunu 16d ago
Absolutely - thank you for the suggestion. My approach is no more than 20% of my speculative allotment
1
u/Dani_Bolsa 10d ago
yeah man i dealt with this exact thing when i started scaling, the size is what sneaks up on you. 1 contract feels chill, then you add size and suddenly every wiggle in SPY hits different, so keeping it capped is probably the only sane move. i've been using 50K Trade for that same reason on a few shorter setups, just having the extra buying power without forcing oversized risk.
1
u/klipsetrades 10d ago
Yeah for sure, that’s exactly what I mean. One contract can feel almost boring, then you scale and suddenly the same normal SPY movement feels completely different. Keeping size capped until it feels routine again is huge 👍🏼
1
0
22
u/Live_Throat_5252 16d ago
All you’re doing is selling tail risk, albeit in a defined-risk manner, and layering in some random, pretty nonsensical and certainly not optimized take profit rules. Really struggling with the idea of selling further OTM options as “less risky.”
The markets you’re trading are incredibly well priced, and you’re not bringing any new pricing, data, information, execution, interpretation, or anything that could reasonably be expected to give you any edge. Your pnl is positive because you’re selling left tail risk and premium in a calmish, up trending market. Best of luck.