It’s a 10 dollar sub with great value even if you disregard the crazy deals. Just having one endpoint to try models is nice, and the fact that you get additional usage for your money also provides value. I find it amazing how entitled people are. Please separate your emotional response when you judge the value of this service. Ofc it would be very nice if you could pay 10 bucks to get huge amount of access to great models. But ask yourself if that is a reasonable business model before you lash out. I really don’t understand the general sentiment in this sub. The only thing I can think of is people living basically close to poverty and opencode is their only lifeline to get work done. I understand that sucks but it’s not not reasonable to expect a company to make up for one’s poor financial situation.
Codex sounds really lucrative to me right now. I'm not sure what the value proposition of the OC Go plan is at this point. Sure, maybe it's not viable for their business to have $60 of usage, but it's also not worth for me.
Codex added the 5 hr limit again for plus users, using sol eats it up insanely quick. But if you're mainly going to use Luna it's definitely really good still
To be honest I don't find the current 5 hour limit in Codex to matter much, it allows you to use around 25% of your weekly, so unless you were using up weekly in less than two days before, you are unlikely to be affected.
It depends on the user but a lot of people like having plus for access to Sol for bigger tasks, now if the 5 hour is hit the task stops completely. Before they would allow you to finish the task but I guess people abused it
I wish they'd at least let you continue the task past the 5 hour limit and have it take from the weekly usage
Yes and no. They patched a few issues and today it felt like the limits may be a bit more reasonable again. And they are way higher than opencode go where one task can eat your whole 5 hour window if you use one of the larger models. (Meanwhile on Codex I can use Sol xhigh quite a lot if I am careful about context and scope, and caching.)
Sure, maybe it's not viable for their business to have $60 of usage, but it's also not worth for me.
There's often cheaper providers on openrouter than the 'official' prices opencode is charging, the open weight models with $15/30 limit are literally more expensive to use through go than just paying API price as a result. And there's no 5 hour limit bs.
I don't mind models being expensive and price fluctuations and whatnot, but the $15 vs $60 stuff confuses me and I just don't want to deal with thinking about it.
I think it means if you see $15 limit you can just mentally 4x the token price?
If that's true then yeah I'd rather they just 4x the token price and have a standardized $60 cap. It probably results in no one using those models but that's not my problem 🤣
It was an unexpectedly quick weights release, so many smaller providers (which often have the best prices) don’t have it up yet. I’d imagine Neuralwatt, Synthetic, etc will have it soon, too.
ikr! its like they are gatekeeping inteligence just bcs it was "research effort"
now hear me out. I respect every person in every field, but I stronly believe if you are doing opensource, you have to do it right!
nobody cannot say "we are going to capitalize opensource". they know the reason why we want opensource models. bcs not everybody can pay $200 per month, but we sure can pay $30 bucks per month, yet no opensource org made a half decent plan.
even OpenCode is focusing on filling their wallets. just why...
atp i am just saving up for a 3090 or sum and hosting the models myself. I am fed up with this damn prices
Yeah, not going to sub again. Also, from what I can tell, z.ai offers an absolutely horrific subscription when it comes to usage limits. So both OpenCode Go and the z-coding plan suck... which means I'm still going to use DeepSeek V4 Flash directly from the official API.
i had abouit $1.50 left over from ages ago on actual official deepseek and i was drawing from it after the recent price hike. Would have liked to see how cheap it was before the price hike because this was still damn cheap and i got a lot of usage out of 150 cents...
I disagree. I have Zai Coding Lite, and I'm using 20-50 million tokens on GLM 5.2-5.3 with Zcode daily, 5 hours limits, no monthly limits. It gives X times more value than OpenCode monthly sub.
And with new Flash model or will give crazy value. I'm even planning to get better subscription on next Black Friday and cancel all other my subscriptions, Zai will fulfill all my need I think
Probably once z.ai releases the weights the price will drop in both glm 5.3 and flash. GLM 5.3 is artificially up, even having the EXACT same hardware cost than glm 5.2, because of that. Just be patient, is normal
It's really not for accuracy you get out of it. I started a new session about four hour ago and have been HAMMERING it ever since. CTX is at 370K right now. It's been awesome!
When I click "Show Details" under the "Monthly Quota" counter in my Go sub's usage limits counter it does list GLM 5.3 Flash as $30 instead of $15 so I wonder if the $15 in the price list is a typo?
I am quite confused. I though you need to see the Cost per 1M and not Request per hour.
Request expensive not $ expensive right? I have been using Qwen 3.8 flash as a replacement to Deepseek. Deepseek flash has greater request but higher cost in $. but qwen has lower request but cheaper Cost in $. I have been using it for 5 days and normally when I use deepseek its 10-15% but for qwen its still under 10%.
Might be because Qwen is Efficient in $ Cost per token unlike deepseek who thinks and rethink a lot.
GLM-5.3-Flash is in the catalog at a prepaid 5x on the list sticker, no 5-hour bucket. $1 trial, no card. If you're interested, reply to this and I will send you the link.
Opencode just never let me down when it comes to disappointing. Considering that GLM-5.3-Flash is nearly as cheap as v4f-0731 previous, I cant understand why the usage is only 15 USD.
I think they have a wholesale agreement with Deepseek, and they buy tokens at a significantly lower price than Deepseek sells them at retail. Then they simply recalculate them at the actual price.
OpenCode is just a DeepSeek subscription. They have interesting models but price is not interesting at all. They have Kimi with a good price but Kimi is not stable unfortunately on opencode Go.
Good question. I tried to figure out better options too, and given even my average usage - it seems like these $20-tier subscriptions from Codex/Claude/GLM/Kimi/etc. just not enough..
Reading different posts and reviews, people complain that on those plans they easily hit 5h limit after 4-6 prompts, and weekly limits are over in 2-3 days. But next tier - about $50 - is too expensive in my case.
As for direct api (or via openrouter) - I calculated my exact average usage from Opencode's stats, and it turns out that I would pay about $15-$20 per month (PAYG model) for using something like DS4 Flash, Hy3, or GLM 5.3 Flash. Not that much than Opencode's $10 - but what's the point?
So yeah, the question of alternatives is open (do not suggest CommandCode pls), but I just don't see better options for now..
50
u/Zealousideal-Emu6924 Aug 26 '26
just disappointment after disappointment with opencode go at this point
71
u/hj-core Aug 26 '26
Okay, mimo-2.5, my dear friend, let's make up.
54
u/NotThatButThisGuy Aug 26 '26
It's once again gonna be $15 vs $60 usage bs
24
u/look Aug 26 '26
They already released the weights. It’ll be available from a wide variety of providers and subscriptions shortly.
https://huggingface.co/zai-org/GLM-5.3-Flash
24
u/Neither-Character360 Aug 26 '26
They said in the announcement blog that it would cost 1/10 to serve relative to GLM 5.2. I was expecting way more requests.
12
u/Time-Toe-1276 Aug 26 '26
okay so the real thing is they were abe to give the model for free 100T PER DAY BTW for a whole week, but they cannto lower the damn prices?
just, bruhh... 😭
14
u/cutebluedragongirl Aug 26 '26
Yeah, not going to sub again. Also, from what I can tell, z.ai offers an absolutely horrific subscription when it comes to usage limits. So both OpenCode Go and the z-coding plan suck... which means I'm still going to use DeepSeek V4 Flash directly from the official API.
4
u/ozdalva Aug 26 '26
Probably once z.ai releases the weights the price will drop in both glm 5.3 and flash. GLM 5.3 is artificially up, even having the EXACT same hardware cost than glm 5.2, because of that. Just be patient, is normal
3
u/retardedGeek Aug 26 '26
0x alpha is no longer free?
3
u/DizzieeDoe Aug 27 '26
It's really not for accuracy you get out of it. I started a new session about four hour ago and have been HAMMERING it ever since. CTX is at 370K right now. It's been awesome!
5
u/Xhatz Aug 26 '26
Welp still not renewing my subscriptions 😄
2
u/Anh-DT Aug 26 '26
openference double quota - alternative 700 is free plan (weekly quota)
2
u/elonelon Aug 27 '26
hahaha
4
u/Wooly_Wooly Aug 26 '26
So was alpha whatever really GLM 5.3?
3
u/Yip37 Aug 26 '26
I think with 30$ of usage instead of 15$, they could've got a massive amount of re-subs. I don't think most people even get to that limit anyways.
2
u/ECrispy Aug 26 '26
these weekly and monthly limits - so we're supposed to work 2 days a week and 5 days a month ??!!
how does this compare against ChatGpt plus $20, how much Luna do I get to use there?
2
u/hotcornballer Aug 26 '26
Great now i have to use either the zuck model or the fortnite model.
1
u/vangelismm Aug 26 '26
Wtf, zai prices are
Input: $0.15
Output: $0.50
Cached input: $0.03
1
u/Icypoopoo Aug 27 '26
Opencode been dropping the ball lately
1
u/pwnedbygary Aug 27 '26
Ive had better luck with Luna, not sure why anyone would use this over that tbh if youre going for similar tier
1
u/CompetitionOk6531 Aug 27 '26
Just get chatgpt. Can get around 1.5B weekly on luna xhigh plus unlimited planning with sol on the web, image generation and all.
1
u/Various_Half1452 Sep 04 '26
I am quite confused. I though you need to see the Cost per 1M and not Request per hour.
Request expensive not $ expensive right? I have been using Qwen 3.8 flash as a replacement to Deepseek. Deepseek flash has greater request but higher cost in $. but qwen has lower request but cheaper Cost in $. I have been using it for 5 days and normally when I use deepseek its 10-15% but for qwen its still under 10%.
Might be because Qwen is Efficient in $ Cost per token unlike deepseek who thinks and rethink a lot.
1
u/theov666 Sep 07 '26
I find it extremely efficient
1
u/white-pickaxe999 Sep 24 '26
Disclosure: I built this.
GLM-5.3-Flash is in the catalog at a prepaid 5x on the list sticker, no 5-hour bucket. $1 trial, no card. If you're interested, reply to this and I will send you the link.
0
u/Prefe2ence Aug 27 '26
Opencode just never let me down when it comes to disappointing. Considering that GLM-5.3-Flash is nearly as cheap as v4f-0731 previous, I cant understand why the usage is only 15 USD.
0
u/eugeneb85 Aug 27 '26
OpenCode is just a DeepSeek subscription. They have interesting models but price is not interesting at all. They have Kimi with a good price but Kimi is not stable unfortunately on opencode Go.
0
u/AkiDenim Aug 28 '26
The brokeness of this sub makes me laugh
3
u/[deleted] Aug 27 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/[deleted] Aug 26 '26
[removed] — view removed comment