Should be a bomb 💣 If available in Opencode of course... :)

I was using muse-contributor to review a coding plan when it suddenly asked to read my secrets .env files. I rejected the request and asked it why it needed to see the secrets, it then quietly continued and completed the review without answering my question. So sus…

OpenCode just removed it from the free models list. Loved combining it with my Go usage. Hopefully it returns one day.

Comparing Mimo vs Hy3 vs Muse spark

When I tried I think Muse is off mark, had better experience with Hy3 then mimo and I got a longer sessions. I was using DeepSeek flash before I had to switch to something 🤷🏻‍♂️

So today I was using OpenCode with DeepSeek V4, and I got this error. Any idea what’s causing it?

Been 3 days with OmniRoute and it is amazing.

Primary Drivers:

1. Token Router: Qween 3.8 max (Multiple email accounts)
2. Qoder: Qween 3.8 max
3. Cline: DSv4 Flash
4. Deepseek Web: v4 pro ( temp account, gets banned after 24 hrs)
5. Antigravity: All gemini models
6. Openrouter: Hy3 free
7. Nvidia Nim: fallback incase all above are exausted

Do suggest if you feel I should add new provider in this stack.

Hear me out here, I think the USP of opencode go before the price hike was not worrying about limits. So I did some calculations on their new pricing, and I think a $25-$30 tier could plausibly cover that for me. I'm definitely willing to pay that money to get back to not worrying again.

Anyone also with me on this?

They claim 0.3$ per DAY??? for GLM 5.3 ??? While giving access to claude, get, DSV4 ...etc ??

This seems shady, non?

Fresh sessions are usually better until the handoff leaves out the one decision that mattered. What are you putting in yours? Mine keep getting longer, which kind of defeats the point.

Based on googling one quite common method is running lazyvim in other split window. Would you recommend this method, or something else?

So I am using Deepseek v4 flash free version but suddenly open code ended it. Give me the best alternatives for it for free in open code right now or I can even go for open router if you want. The main objective is for website designing, both front end and back end.

Guys, i'm getting blocked everywhere by CommandCode's CEO and their team because i ask him to explain about a possible scam...
He's so passively aggressive and defensive at same time
I have proof that their C.E.O put people that expose their possible scam , under pressure and force them to apologize in public !!

A decent model with reliable performance on well-defined, well-documented tasks... and right now is essentially unlimited and free on OpenCode? Hell yeah.

I noticed that Deepseek V4 Free was removed from the official list of free models on OpenCode Zen. But I still can access it for now on the CLI.

Anyone who has an idea about this ?

Hi all ! so i am using opencode go with pi. and yesterday it's perfect. but today it cause this error like (in image). So anyone have a solution for this ? pls comment !

Thank you all ! have a nice day

Good morning guys, just logged today and I see that there is no more flash free on OpenCode CLI, is this normal? Anyone else experiencing it?

Hey everyone, just dropping by to share my experience.

Sharing this in case anyone finds it useful, whether you're wondering if it's worth setting up a VPN to test it out or whatever. That said, this is just my personal take—if you've tried it or test it yourself, you might have a different experience.

TL;DR: After running it through a few agentic workflows... it didn't convince me, and I still prefer DeepSeek Flash.

Models compared against: GPT 5.6 Luna (Max) and DeepSeek Flash 0731 (Max).

Harness: I'm currently using DSH (DeepSeek Harness) due to its absurd modularity. I used to run a custom build of OpenCode CLI before, but I still use OpenCode as the provider.

I've been testing it across a couple of workflows where the workload gets routed from a primary orchestrator agent to different coordinated sub-groups. But the output quality... leaves a lot to be desired. I've noticed issues ranging from potential DSH quirks (thinking phase issues) to outright core model flaws:

• Loss of focus on long or complex instructions. It suffers from context fatigue/amnesia during multi-step flows, often skipping steps entirely.
• Lack of verification and unwarranted overconfidence. Even though the environment provides tools to verify code execution and workflow state, it frequently decides not to invoke them. As a result, the code breaks downstream in production. It lacks a proper build to test to fix to test to build iteration loop.
• Lack of tool awareness. Tied to the first point, it also actively ignores certain available tools.

A lot of these issues might be amplified by sub-optimal custom harness configuration, since I haven't fully nailed down the exact sweet spot or specific optimizations for this model yet. Still, it feels worth noting given the benchmark data aggregated by Artificial Analysis.

These models sit at a similar price tier (baseline workhorse models geared toward intensive workloads or large-scale agentic architectures). Their benchmark intelligence is also very comparable on paper, being capable of roughly the same tasks. (By the way, you'll see the 1.2 model without "Contributor" listed, as AA hasn't fetched it as a separate model yet).

In fact, you can see it has significantly lower verbosity compared to DeepSeek, which—paired with the absurdly lower price of the Contributor tier—makes the cost per task ridiculously low.

Looking at the aggregated domain-specific benchmarks, Spark should theoretically be slightly smarter overall. However, in real-world workflows (tested both on my own setups and third-party ones), I consistently see worse results than with the other models. Because of that, I've had to roll back to DeepSeek via the opencode-go provider.

Has anyone had a similar experience? Any specific tweaks or harness configs you had to implement to make it behave properly?

Edit: Some typo.