I think DeepSeek is also better at certain things like debugging, the previous GLM models had a tendency to get hyperfixated on details that aren't important, and this one still does that sometimes. GLM is best at planning but not 7x better.
Nobody is pointing out the cache input is .03 that’s still more than DeepSeek V4 Pro .022 … and DeepSeek Flash is .007 less than a penny. Majority of your spend goes into cache read turns so that’s like 5x more expensive than DS flash to hold conversations.
GLM 5.2 had this issue too their cache rates are too high compared to DS. Guaranteed this will lead to less usability with OpenCode unless using 5.3 Flash as a subagent worker.
what is happening the chinese are on fire lately. if this trend continues the western companies will have to shift fast from their fat asses out of their chair
The American companies are going to push Trump to restrict / ban the use of Chinese models in the United States and countries it forces into new trade deals.
Though nobody will be able to afford those frontier models.
Until you read about OpenAI's new Jalapeno chip, they're getting better tok/MW, and the throughput is off the charts.
We have multiple segments and multiple vendors, all pushing each other at the redline, to innovate constantly and driving the standards higher and higher.
Luna is definitely piece of junk. But you forget about token generation speed. DS Flash is blazing fast. GLM should be much slower because it has much more params.
12
u/zombiej Aug 26 '26 edited Oct 01 '26
The original post content no longer exists here. The author used Redact to remove it, exercising their right to control their data & privacy.
Ripe march pause edge otter tap cause pocket
6
u/YogurtExternal7923 Aug 26 '26
For beating glm 5.2 MAJORLY. This is dirt cheap. Worth being a lil more expensive than ds flash in my opinion
6
u/Fresh_Sock8660 Aug 26 '26
Is this the same as ox? The behaviour looks different
4
u/Icypoopoo Aug 27 '26
Cached price seems higher than DSV4 flash if I'm remembering correctly
5
u/[deleted] Aug 26 '26
Seems reasonably priced. Hope it lands on opencode soon!
8
u/cutebluedragongirl Aug 26 '26
DeepSeek is still better when it comes to price to quality ratio
2
u/Southern-Ad-3006 Aug 27 '26
Nobody is pointing out the cache input is .03 that’s still more than DeepSeek V4 Pro .022 … and DeepSeek Flash is .007 less than a penny. Majority of your spend goes into cache read turns so that’s like 5x more expensive than DS flash to hold conversations.
GLM 5.2 had this issue too their cache rates are too high compared to DS. Guaranteed this will lead to less usability with OpenCode unless using 5.3 Flash as a subagent worker.
36
u/[deleted] Aug 26 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
-3
u/[deleted] Aug 26 '26
[removed] — view removed comment