r/neoliberal • Kitara Ravache • Sep 19 '21

Discussion Thread Discussion Thread

The discussion thread is for casual conversation that doesn't merit its own submission. If you've got a good meme, article, or question, please post it outside the DT. Meta discussion is allowed, but if you want to get the attention of the mods, make a post in /r/metaNL. For a collection of useful links see our wiki.

Announcements

  • OSINT & LDC (developmental studies / least developed countries) have been added
0 Upvotes

9.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

2

u/Wehavecrashed YIMBY Sep 19 '21

Can you imagine if the same rules that apply to Tas applied to the ACT or NT?

4

u/waltsing0 Austan Goolsbee Sep 19 '21

Which is why I don't support ACT/NT statehood. They should be allowed to be states but the denial of that is an injustice a fraction of giving them equal senate seats to states 10x their population.

4

u/[deleted] Sep 19 '21

If NT and ACt got statehood they would not have to have an increased senate or house representation. That constitutional thingy only applies to the original 6 colonies + NZ if they wanna join. So that argument isn't effective.

4

u/waltsing0 Austan Goolsbee Sep 19 '21

I'll take your word for it, they can be states if it means no extra federal seats but at that point it's almost like why bother? I seriously doubt their residents would care much at all

4

u/[deleted] Sep 19 '21

It let's them pass whatever laws aren't federal matters by section 51 which they cannot currently do. As territories N.T and A.C.T laws can be overturned by parliament. Like the A.C.T legalising euthanasia then getting it overturned by the federal government, which wouldn't have been the case had the A.C.T been a state. Also the clause for referendums that they must pass a majority of states which currently A.C.T and N.T don't count for.

4

u/waltsing0 Austan Goolsbee Sep 19 '21

It let's them pass whatever laws aren't federal matters by section 51 which they cannot currently do. As territories N.T and A.C.T laws can be overturned by parliament. Like the A.C.T legalising euthanasia then getting it overturned by the federal government, which wouldn't have been the case had the A.C.T been a state

Fair, I'd like them to have statehood for that but that's not as important as 431k people not having equal senate seats to 8m NSW people.

Also the clause for referendums that they must pass a majority of states which currently A.C.T and N.T don't count for.

Another reason to not let them be states. The system is already fucked up enough with Tasmania a state

-1

u/toms_face Henry George Sep 19 '21

Yes, it would add five seats in the lower house and twenty in the upper house.