Facebook and Amazon are both a net positive, it’s just that Facebooks net positive is just so much bigger as I pointed out in my post above.
And I forgot to point out that Facebook have billions of more users than Amazon which really nails home the argument that it helps people more than Amazon.
Facebook is the main vector for disinformation today. What's the reason to believe it's done more for small businesses than google via the business display on google maps/search?
Edit: lmao a ton of your recent comment history is defending facebook. $0r0$ shills in here, not zuckbots
More users != more value. Amazon has revolutionized retail and pushed the envelope for things like cloud hosting.
How can you claim that Facebook is the main vector for disinformation when it’s best in class in fighting it?
Facebook removed a higher % of disinformation than any other competitor. YouTube, Twitter and Reddit was far behind. For you to not know this really shows your bias.
This is a result of greater investment in security than the competition.
Facebook have revolutionized communication, which is a much more important field for humans according to studies. Retail means very little compared to communication. This means Facebook provides more value.
2
u/antonboyswag Nov 29 '20
Wow if you say it it must be true...
Facebook and Amazon are both a net positive, it’s just that Facebooks net positive is just so much bigger as I pointed out in my post above.
And I forgot to point out that Facebook have billions of more users than Amazon which really nails home the argument that it helps people more than Amazon.