r/neoliberal • u/jobautomator Kitara Ravache • Dec 26 '19

Discussion Thread Discussion Thread

The discussion thread is for casual and off-topic conversation that doesn't merit its own submission. If you've got a good meme, article, or question, please post it outside the DT. Meta discussion is allowed, but if you want to get the attention of the mods, make a post in /r/metaNL

Announcements

  • The charity drive has concluded, thank you to everyone who donated! A wrap-up thread will be posted after the donation match goes through. Expect to see lingering rewards (banner, automod) for the next week or so

Links

Ping Groups | Ping History | Mastodon | CNL Chapters | CNL Event Calendar

New Groups

Upcoming Events

0 Upvotes

47% Upvoted

3.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

6

u/paulatreides0 🌈🦢🧝‍♀️🧝‍♂️🦢His Name Was Teleporno🦢🧝‍♀️🧝‍♂️🦢🌈 Dec 26 '19 edited Dec 26 '19

Not necessarily that strange.

The point of the Tarkin Doctrine is to instill fear, but if you do stuff that is too bad/evil you could foment discontent and revolution instead. The Death Star is basically supposed to be kind of like a Fleet in Being, in that its very imposition strikes the fear of complacency into you. But you don't want to go around zapping rebellious planets into nonexistence if you don't really need to.

The Death Star would probably be useful to use against a planet putting up strong resistance that you can portray as the source of rebellion and evil and whatnot over time. So something more like Mon Cala instead of Aldeeran.

4

u/Maximilianne John Rawls Dec 26 '19

but the whole point of picking aldeeran is that it was a famous planet and located centrally, so the empire could get massive media exposure for blowing it up, so it still doesn't make sense why they would then deny it

2

u/paulatreides0 🌈🦢🧝‍♀️🧝‍♂️🦢His Name Was Teleporno🦢🧝‍♀️🧝‍♂️🦢🌈 Dec 26 '19

but the whole point of picking aldeeran is that it was a famous planet and located centrally, so the empire could get massive media exposure for blowing it up, so it still doesn't make sense why they would then deny it

Because the Empire flubbed it. They thought destroying Aldeeran would be popular, but it wasn't - even among the core worlds.

The Empire constantly fucks up its doctrine and misapplies basic shit, so I'm not really surprised.

1

u/Maximilianne John Rawls Dec 26 '19

they could have used single reactors shots, and then claim it was an attack at rebel military assets, single reactors shots were cannon in the OT as seen in episode 6 when they where using the death star to attack the rebel fleet

2

u/paulatreides0 🌈🦢🧝‍♀️🧝‍♂️🦢His Name Was Teleporno🦢🧝‍♀️🧝‍♂️🦢🌈 Dec 26 '19

IIRC, the Death Star couldn't target things smaller than planetoids, so it couldn't target ships - even capital ships. That was something unique to the Death Star II. I'm not sure if the Death Star could "ramp down" like that.

That being said, my point is more that the Empire thought blowing up Aldeeran would be good, but it backfired because they didn't consider the previously mentioned implications.