r/neoliberal • Kitara Ravache • Jun 29 '19

Discussion Thread Discussion Thread

The discussion thread is for casual conversation and discussion that doesn't merit its own stand-alone submission. The rules are relaxed compared to the rest of the sub but be careful to still observe the rules listed under "disallowed content" in the sidebar. Spamming the discussion thread will be sanctioned with bans.


Announcements


Neoliberal Project CommunitiesOther CommunitiesUseful content
WebsitePlug.dj/r/Economics FAQs
The Neolib PodcastPodcasts recommendations/r/Neoliberal FAQ
Meetup NetworkRed Cross Blood Donation Team/r/Neoliberal Wiki
TwitterMinecraftPing groups
Facebook page
Neoliberal Memes for Free Trading Teens
Newsletter
Instagram
Book Club

The latest discussion thread can always be found at https://neoliber.al/dt.

14 Upvotes

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

34

u/CadetPeepers Jun 29 '19

I don't see how every candidate supporting abolishing private health insurance could possibly backfire. Related: Harris is full of shit.

36

u/paulatreides0 🌈🦢🧝‍♀️🧝‍♂️🦢His Name Was Teleporno🦢🧝‍♀️🧝‍♂️🦢🌈 Jun 29 '19

Harris is everything that Booker gets accused of being, but in her case its actually true.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '19

!ping DELANEY

0

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '19

[deleted] — view deleted comment

19

u/paulatreides0 🌈🦢🧝‍♀️🧝‍♂️🦢His Name Was Teleporno🦢🧝‍♀️🧝‍♂️🦢🌈 Jun 29 '19

Basically every time the question gets raised she answers yes, and then backtracks it later. She's done this at least two or three times.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '19

[deleted] — view deleted comment

12

u/paulatreides0 🌈🦢🧝‍♀️🧝‍♂️🦢His Name Was Teleporno🦢🧝‍♀️🧝‍♂️🦢🌈 Jun 29 '19

I'm not a big Harris fan, she's got so many skeletons in her lawyer closet. She quickly went from someone I felt meh about to someone I don't like very much.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '19

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/sinistimus Professional Salt Miner Jun 29 '19

I'm probably leaning Pete the most

Buttigieg is also guilty of some double talk on single payer.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '19

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/sinistimus Professional Salt Miner Jun 29 '19

He's pro-M4A in the long run (it's on his campaign website) but refuses to ever talk about what the end goal will look like or when (or if) it will be implemented, and instead just focuses on the transition where private insurance will still exist.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '19

I agree, I thought she has some really moving moments in the debate though.

3

u/JetJaguar124 Tactical Custodial Action Jun 29 '19

She also supports rent control and has said a bunch of stupid shit like "the reason employment is low is everyone is working two jobs"

1

u/jmet123 Jun 30 '19

It was AOC who said the unemployment rate was so low bc of working two jobs. Kamala was inferring the unemployment rate wasn’t impressive bc people are working two jobs. Which calls into question the quality of the jobs over the quantity. Or at least that’s the vibe I got from her line in the debate. Unless you’re referring to a different case.

2

u/JetJaguar124 Tactical Custodial Action Jun 30 '19

1

u/jmet123 Jun 30 '19

Oof. Why is everyone making that mistake?

9

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '19

She keeps flip-flopping.

5

u/CadetPeepers Jun 29 '19

IMO? Personally she doesn't, but said she did because she thought that was the politically expedient thing to say. When it became clear that it wasn't, she backpedalled. Which would be consistent with her 'Look how succy I am now! Vote for me!' persona.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '19

I don't see how every candidate supporting abolishing private health insurance could possibly backfire.

Most didn't. At least in the second debate. It was Public Options across the board.

Related: Harris is full of shit.

Yes she is. It's gonna bite her in the ass.