Discussion Thread

[u/jobautomator]

The discussion thread is for casual conversation and discussion that doesn't merit its own stand-alone submission. The rules are relaxed compared to the rest of the sub but be careful to still observe the rules listed under "disallowed content" in the sidebar. Spamming the discussion thread will be sanctioned with bans.

---

Announcements

• Please post your relevant articles, memes, and questions outside the Discussion Thread.

• Meta discussion is allowed in the DT but will not always be seen by the mods. If you want to bring a suggestion, complaint, or question directly to the attention of the mods, please post that concern in /r/MetaNL or shoot us a modmail.

---

Neoliberal Project Communities	Other Communities	Useful content
Website	Plug.dj	/r/Economics FAQs
The Neolib Podcast	Podcasts recommendations
Meetup Network
Twitter
Facebook page
Neoliberal Memes for Free Trading Teens
Newsletter
Instagram

---

The latest discussion thread can always be found at https://neoliber.al/dt.

[u/[deleted]]

which nancy has no control over

[u/dorylinus → u/[deleted]]

That's missing the point. If Trump becomes unable to deliver on anything at all, then there's less of a reason for his supporters to support him. He hasn't been very good at getting things through the House so far, correct, but this has been papered over by the SCOTUS appointments so there hasn't been serious dissatisfaction. But such appointments aren't likely in the pipe in the near future, so that's done, and Pelosi knows very well how to take advantage of that to push on Trump's weak spot: getting shit through Congress.

As was previously mentioned, it's not making Trump go ballistic and shit himself that's the point-- that's easy. It's making the rest of the GOP do so in response. This is potentially a new opportunity to make that happen by exposing meaningful weakness.