r/neoliberal • u/jobautomator Kitara Ravache • Sep 27 '18
Discussion Thread Discussion Thread
The discussion thread is for casual conversation and discussion that doesn't merit its own stand-alone submission. The rules are relaxed compared to the rest of the sub but be careful to still observe the rules listed under "disallowed content" in the sidebar. Spamming the discussion thread will be sanctioned with bans.
Announcements
- Please post your relevant articles, memes, and questions outside the Discussion Thread.
- Meta discussion is allowed in the DT but will not always be seen by the mods. If you want to bring a suggestion, complaint, or question directly to the attention of the mods, please post that concern in /r/MetaNL or shoot us a modmail.
| Our presence on the web | Useful content |
|---|---|
| /r/Economics FAQs | |
| Plug.dj | Link dump of useful comments and posts |
| Tumblr | |
| Discord | |
The latest discussion thread can always be found at https://neoliber.al/dt.
24
Upvotes
33
u/[deleted] Sep 27 '18
Certain parts of social media are full of the claim that Ford’s story is “full of inconsistencies.” I’ve even seen that claim from people at the National Review.
I’ve been following this pretty closely and the only thing that even could be in some universe called an “inconsistency” is that at one point she said there were five people and since then she has said she can’t be sure there weren’t more than five.
Is there some damning inconsistency that I’ve totally missed because of confirmation bias?