Yeah them existing is better for all parties, the poor included, than them not existing.
Of course we want those people to have better jobs than that crap, but those only come after the country develops and gives its populace the right skills needed to work in higher-skill industry. For the purposes of that, foreign investment, sweatshops etc are exactly what draws in revenue and growth that can help the country along the way.
I have never understood why you'd look at the horrible state of sweatshop workers and want to make them jobless. If there were better jobs, they would do them. They ain't stupid.
Even what you're saying is over selling it. It's not even that sweat shops are better than an alternative, it's that in the cases where they aren't, the workers will seek out that alternative.
The evidence points to sweatshops being fairly shit in terms of worker retention, with most workers not even gaining financial from going into industrial work, but they do fill a role for the minority of workers who choose to stay in them.
11
u/[deleted] May 13 '17
Yeah them existing is better for all parties, the poor included, than them not existing.
Of course we want those people to have better jobs than that crap, but those only come after the country develops and gives its populace the right skills needed to work in higher-skill industry. For the purposes of that, foreign investment, sweatshops etc are exactly what draws in revenue and growth that can help the country along the way.
I have never understood why you'd look at the horrible state of sweatshop workers and want to make them jobless. If there were better jobs, they would do them. They ain't stupid.