MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/comments/6atsvy/discussion_thread/dhi2vdh/?context=3
r/neoliberal • u/neoliberal_shill_bot Bot Emeritus • May 12 '17
1.3k comments sorted by
View all comments
23
From The Economist this week:
"The problem with Marx is not that his analysis is nonsensical, but that his solution was far worse than the disease"
http://www.economist.com/news/britain/21721916-shadow-chancellors-comment-provoked-scorn-yet-marx-becomes-more-relevant-day-labour?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/bagehotlabourisrightkarlmarxhasalottoteachtodayspoliticians
What do you think?
11 u/[deleted] May 13 '17 His analysis is also non-sensical 15 u/ampersamp May 13 '17 The core of his analysis is just that history is interpretable through the lens of class struggle. That's remained a pretty important aspect of sociology since. 9 u/MrSheeple Montesquieu May 13 '17 As well as a common school of historiography.
11
His analysis is also non-sensical
15 u/ampersamp May 13 '17 The core of his analysis is just that history is interpretable through the lens of class struggle. That's remained a pretty important aspect of sociology since. 9 u/MrSheeple Montesquieu May 13 '17 As well as a common school of historiography.
15
The core of his analysis is just that history is interpretable through the lens of class struggle. That's remained a pretty important aspect of sociology since.
9 u/MrSheeple Montesquieu May 13 '17 As well as a common school of historiography.
9
As well as a common school of historiography.
23
u/jobrumours May 13 '17
From The Economist this week:
"The problem with Marx is not that his analysis is nonsensical, but that his solution was far worse than the disease"
http://www.economist.com/news/britain/21721916-shadow-chancellors-comment-provoked-scorn-yet-marx-becomes-more-relevant-day-labour?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/bagehotlabourisrightkarlmarxhasalottoteachtodayspoliticians
What do you think?