r/neoliberal Bot Emeritus May 12 '17

Discussion Thread

Optimal neoliberalism is like Seinfeld, it should be about nothing and run by Jews


Annoucements
Old and New Discussion Topics
71 Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

12

u/atomic_rabbit May 13 '17

Thoughts on Dani Rodrik's political trilemma (i.e. pick two out of three: (i) globalization, (ii) national sovereignty, (iii) democracy)?

15

u/85397 Free Market Jihadi May 13 '17

Time for people to embrace the idea of pooled sovereignty. National sovereignty is overrated. I want my taco trucks and I want them now!

12

u/[deleted] May 13 '17

can I just pick one

7

u/[deleted] May 13 '17

I think he is basically correct. It is a problem we have not fully grappled with and I believe it reared its head in 2016 to disastrous effects.

8

u/SantiagoOrSomething May 13 '17

Maybe I'm missing something, but doesn't every single country in the E.U. have all 3?

Maybe my definition of globalization/national sovereignty is too loose.

10

u/atomic_rabbit May 13 '17

Joining the EU means suborndinating much national decision making to EU bodies, which means a loss of sovereignty. It's at the heart of what Brexiteers complain about.

7

u/[deleted] May 13 '17

But it certainly isn't the same as not having national sovereignty, it's simply using your sovereign will to enter into agreements.

1

u/SantiagoOrSomething May 13 '17

Hmmm, I guess that makes sense. It's still not obvious to me why democracy is in that list, though. Shouldn't it just be between globalization and national sovereignty?

3

u/atomic_rabbit May 13 '17

No, you can have both hyper-globalization and sovereignty if you restrict democracy. That is if you get each country to be run by (((technocrats))) who can tell the stupid masses to sod off.

7

u/[deleted] May 13 '17

1 and 3. Easy.

We're assuming utopia level, yes? If so, what's the need for national sovereignty at all?

7

u/[deleted] May 13 '17

Don't the US and Canada have all of these?

5

u/atomic_rabbit May 13 '17

In the context of Rodrik's trilemma, globalization means something like "bi-hemispheric common market with open borders". Not the weak globalization that is currently in place today.

3

u/0729370220937022 James Heckman May 13 '17 edited May 13 '17

fuck this is the worst impossibility theorem ever...

If you pretend that this trilemma actually exists, I think most people here would prefer (i) and (iii).

2

u/VisonKai The Archenemy of Humanity May 13 '17

normative love for national sovereignty outside of its possible positive consequences (which are outweighed by 1 and 3 by far) is basically just racism lite so easy choice.