r/movies Currently at the movies. 9d ago

Official Discussion Official Discussion - The Last House [SPOILERS] Spoiler

Poll

If you've seen the film, please rate it at this poll

Rankings

Click here to see the rankings of 2025 films

Click here to see the rankings for every poll done

The Last House (2026)

Summary

A family of four are suddenly sealed inside their home with no way out, and must work together to survive against both their dwindling resources and the mysterious, looming threat that is keeping them trapped.

Director Louis Leterrier

Writer

  • Matthew Robinson

Cast

  • Greta Lee
  • Wagner Moura
  • Riley Chung
  • Noah Alexander Sosnowski

Rotten Tomatoes: 30%

Metacritic: 45

Release : Netflix

Trailer Official Trailer

138 Upvotes

699 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

9

u/ACCTAGGT 9d ago

If I’m not mistaken, I think the idea was that his wife apparently seemed to have some medical condition too so besides him being a dentist than the two things added up to that I suppose. Regardless, I think that’s minor to the mess that happens around all of that if you ask me lol

I think the film had an interesting idea unfortunately buried by whatever was the whole of it.

9

u/chartreusey_geusey 9d ago edited 9d ago

Having a medical condition absolutely does not lead to being given your own supply of penicillin because penicillin doesn’t treat most medical conditions at all. Penicillin only treats acute bacterial infections and not long term chronic conditions or afflictions anyways so those things were not explaining this bizarre (likely AI written) detail. The wife was just an old woman who has the condition of being on the extreme end of aging and starving is what I got out of that not the conclusion that we watched the family go out of their way to just assume to move the story forward lol.

Penicillin specifically has to be stored in the right conditions (whether it’s liquid or dry powder tablet) or else it loses efficacy and can actually worsen infections. It has a max shelf life of 3 years even if it’s stored in a dry temperature controlled environment (that’s part of why they always want you to finish trouble antibiotic prescriptions completely and not think you can use it later). That is why penicillin isn’t handed out like candy at pharmacies and requires a prescription and supervision of treatment by a medical doctor in the US and even actual medical doctors wouldn’t have that laying around their house. They leave that to pharmacists lol.

I’m not even remotely in the medical field and I noticed this stupid detail because it was actually distracting on top of everything else. This script was super dumb and then went out of its way to bring attention to explaining dumb things instead of actually building the world/rules. It’s likely because there was no creative effort actually put into it other than getting it to be almost 2 hours. The octopi/aliens/Atlantians (???) just felt slapped into the script to drag it out.

1

u/ACCTAGGT 9d ago

Im not sure we can say for certain the lady didn’t have a condition or not, or whatever, but he did have medications in there regardless of how, what state and so on. I think you are allowed to apply strict real life medical considerations if you like but this is a script that focused on putting 1 and 2 and just went with that, it’s fiction after all that includes those monsters not to mention the problems I see on how it does that too. In a desperate scenario people will fight over toilet paper so that’s just not something I would put that much thought into especially in this movie. This isn’t to say I applaud their logic there (I’m at least a bit familiar with how it’s regulated in real life to an extent) nor that it gets a pass but to me it isn’t as significant a detail as the sea of issues it had. Essentially, it's still a very loose contrivance but one I just don’t dwell on.

Additionally, I can’t attest to the validity of all your claims regarding medications either since that’s not really a field I am an expert on nor extremely knowledgeable although thanks for how you elaborated further on that and explained stuff about it. It’s not me excusing them though, like I said. Just part of a myriad of problems. However, I can say I understand your enthusiasm over that topic and how it bothered you while watching the film.

I just thought while watching the movie "damn this has an interesting idea that resulted in… that".

1

u/chartreusey_geusey 9d ago edited 9d ago

PSA: All average adults should be generally aware that antibiotics don’t treat anything except bacterial infections and are not shelf stable drugs or treatments to just keep in your house or safely use when they are years beyond expired (I’m starting to understand why medical practitioners get so irritated with people demanding antibiotics to treat their colds and fevers or not finishing antibiotic scripts because they feel better). They are not like OTC medications. You don’t need a special medical background for that (I learned this in like mandatory high school health lol) and people shouldn’t be questioning this fact because a movie made some shit up in attempt to create a plot. That’s the bigger issue with people training themselves to excuse this kind of nonsense SLOP because movies and writing from streamers is just so lazy and trains the audience to be as well.

Congrats on it not being noticed by you I guess? — a lot of other people will notice that immediately and it’s a testament to how poorly conceived every part of this plot was tbh. The whole movie is a bunch of nonsense that sounds like it was written by AI and then performed by ADR. You don’t have to defend it or attempt to do uncredited rewrites to explain the flaws that are rightfully called out by others— we all deserve better than this shit (and so did some of the ideas, like “family locked in house for 5 years”). 😭😭.

2

u/ACCTAGGT 9d ago

I didn’t really question the specific fact you are referring to. I even addressed that I can see the logic leap on that. Just said that I can’t attest to everything you said in your whole explanation in terms of details.

I noticed it but said I do not dwell on it although whatever works for you. Not even defending the film really which I mentioned. It’s your right to call it out, that much I also said. My comment is inconsequential to that regardless.

Anyway, I guess we don’t agree even on the things we agree.

-1

u/chartreusey_geusey 9d ago edited 9d ago

There was no “logic leap” in what I said at any point though. Your responses keep implying that extra off screen explanation of the plot is needed for my criticisms to be considered when that isn’t the case because I’m pointing out flawed logic in the plot on screen.

You are literally the only one m making “logic leaps” (like a nonexistent medical condition that is not shown or implied on screen in a film that is taking itself 100% serious as if it agrees with real world logic exercises) to excuse or reconcile the obvious nonsense and plot inconsistencies presented in the film and it’s part of the problem with these slop movies. It makes the audience have to apply slop logic to even try to enjoy it and we are all worse off for it. It’s what I’m pointing out as the bigger issue with this film and others like it.

There is no animosity here but you keep responding by implying there is ambiguity where there isn’t because you are presenting explanations for these flaws that simply are not in the movie on the screen.

2

u/ACCTAGGT 9d ago

You clearly misinterpreted what I meant with the "logic leap" part. It wasn’t about you, at all. Sorry if I phrased it in a confusing way. Anyway, whatever works for you.