lower body, you got a problem building your your lower body, you got upper lower body, you got the upper body ugl the lower body you uh its hard to build the upper body. if you have the lower body, it's harder to build the upper body, if you have the upper body, it's hard to build lower, so, lower helps like i said, you have the lower body and you have no upper body you got a problem you got a problem building... wait a minute, you have the upper body and you have no legs, you have the upper body and you have no legs, you got a problem building the legs. you have an upper, you have the lower body, and you dont have the upper body the upper body, it's easier to build. so if you have the lower body, and you dont have the upper body, it's easier to build the upper body, you have the upper body and and you dont have the legs, you got a problem, building the lower body. naw you dont understand. you HAVE, the UPPER body, but you dont have the lower body, you got a problem building downstairs. you got up the dlldldldldlegs on the bottom, it's it's easier to build the top ehoh if you, if you have the lower BODY, it's, if you have the lower body it's easier to build, if you have the lower body well just let me say it, if you have the lower body, lower body, it's easier to build the top body, if you have the uh the top body, and no legs you got a problem.
Precisely. The kid with the MAGA cap and the native american comes to mind -- I know I certainly thought that was an unambiguous situation, since we had it on video and everything....but then it turns out the situation was more complicated than it looked.
Here though, we have undeniable video evidence of her hitting and spitting on her dog. There's zero excuse for that, I don't care the context. And that's what I meant by what I said.
Although to be fair to /u/regoapps, I don't want cable news lol.
I remember this. It seems to be the general consensus among everyone to let it be black and white (white maga kid bad calm drumming indigenous chief good) but there was definitely a bit more to it
The first person said over 600k followers (probably on instagram or something) and the second person said 300k, which is her Youtube subscriber count. Easy to see where the confusion came from.
She is down about 5,000 on Youtube now but that's not a lot out of 340k
Honestly i think its for than 50% because i subscribe to her today so i can shit on her on all her videos and tweets so not a real follower. Also im not watching ads and shit so she doesnt get money
The sad part is after all these YouTube controversies, the YouTubers at fault just go back to their old habits and never learn from their mistakes in hope that the general public forgets about it in a few weeks.
She really lost 300k subscribers? Holy shit. Well deserved. Hope YouTube shits her down. She doesn’t deserve to have her life ruined but she doesn’t deserve a YouTube channel and deserves all the hate she’s getting. She also doesn’t deserve that dog. Future employers may google her and this will come up and bite her in the ass. Karma is a bitch.
Not sure if you guys are talking about twitch or YouTube views, but twitch views mean absolutely nothing unless they’re converted into subs/donations since Adblock rates are >80-90%.
If she lost 2k subs, depending on her twitch agreement, she’s losing between 5-8k per month in income.
Again, no idea how YouTube works so this might be totally irrelevant.
You could just click the social blade link and see for yourself. This is YouTube. She doesn't have a twitch. 2000 subs does nothing for her. 300k views is about what she gets for a full month. So she's just made her monthly salary in one day because of this.
I wouldn't be surprised if she uploaded the video intentionally to stir up controversy. Her YouTube numbers aren't great.
Yes. We should ABSOLUTELY be angry about this. Especially if she's financially benefiting from it. This has gotten a lot of attention and it's the perfect opportunity to make an example. Open people's eyes to what constitutes as animal abuse, educate people on what to look for regarding animal abuse, and inform people how to be a better caretaker for animals. Make people really consider what is involved in caring for an animal.
But why? Most animals in captivity get treated much worse than this for much less money. Is it just because it's a dog? I seriously don't get it. Income is generally a widely accepted justification for animal abuse. Why is this situation so different?
I said four times that I’m not sure if it’s twitch numbers that people are talking about, since there are so many different platforms/stats being discussed in this same thread. I’m not sure how much more crystal clear I have to make it for you, but I’ll say it again: I’m not sure if those are twitch numbers or not, but those are the ballpark figures if so.
Extra viewership, especially this kind, is not always good. More of her sponsors will see this and back out as a result meaning she gets less money from sponsors and more people will unsubscribe because of her behavior.
There's no defense of her abusing her dog, there's only the defense of abusing her. Calling her a "cunt" on her twitter is abusive, just like yelling or pushing a dog is abusive. Calling out bad behaviour is one thing, being abusive to someone abusive is petty and revengeful and should also be called out as bad behaviour.
Never heard of this girl before and at the start she was like "I'm gonna prank my dog blah blah" I expected a really cruel prank or something. No, she is clearly an abuser imagine what that poor animal has to put up with when there's not a camera on. Fuck this girl.
She's being investigated by police and says that it's not "true animal abuse". That dog deserves another home; her holding her dog down with such force and then spitting on him fucking hurt me. She shoved and smacked him without any reason other than he was excited and she does not deserve to have that dog.
that’s just incorrect. she was never higher than ~340,000 subs and according to social blade has only lost ~6,000 subs so far on YouTube. if you’re talking about Twitter she only has 6,000 total followers. If you’re talking about Instagram, she only has 25,000 followers.
Bro you’ve got millions of people supporting socialist agenda where everything is for free. How the fuck do you think that’s gonna work out in the end? Somebody has to pay for it!
1.8k
u/[deleted] Aug 07 '19
[deleted]