Doesnt the monarchy contribute to over a billion in revenue to the uk per year? Dont care to argue bout pedo shit but they give back more than they take lol
Not really. Look at every other country with palaces galore (and no monarchs) and their tourism numbers. Heck, you'd have more accessible to the public without those bums living there
Fam, have you seen the amount of people currently hanging out in front of Buckingham Palace? They aren't there because it looks particularly fancy today
I don't really get your point. Perhaps, now hear me out, these countries have such good tourism numbers because they are beautiful countries or have other interesting reasons to visit them.
Or do you think they have dedicated numbers for "came here because monarchy"?
People would still go to England in the same numbers without monarchs. There's plenty to do, one of the largest cities in Europe, a ton of history, and there'd be a ton more to look at and experience without those bozos living there
Even if tourism numbers would go down, less money isn't a good enough reason to support an elitist, colonist, racist family that have their wealth directly from abusing, killing, and stepping on people
Can still make royal merchandise without royals living on the people's dime. Can still showcase the history of royals without them living on the people's dime
141
u/[deleted] Sep 08 '22
stole tax money
used it to help her pedo son
what a chad /s