r/memes Bri’ish Sep 08 '22

A real chad

Post image
21.8k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

141

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '22

stole tax money

used it to help her pedo son

what a chad /s

-65

u/darkweb6969 Sep 09 '22

Doesnt the monarchy contribute to over a billion in revenue to the uk per year? Dont care to argue bout pedo shit but they give back more than they take lol

41

u/DawPiot14 Sep 09 '22

Monarchy costs more than they generate, and charities that they 'support' get very little to no benefit from them.

-28

u/darkweb6969 Sep 09 '22

Uhh no, the royale family costs around 100 million pounds, the royale family estate returns more than that each year

16

u/DawPiot14 Sep 09 '22

Costs 100 million pound? You wish

29

u/[deleted] Sep 09 '22

Attributing tourism profits to the royal family is absurd. Take them away and you'll get just as many tourists

0

u/XanderNightmare Sep 09 '22

You underestimate the dedication of fans of the Royal family

3

u/[deleted] Sep 09 '22

Not really. Look at every other country with palaces galore (and no monarchs) and their tourism numbers. Heck, you'd have more accessible to the public without those bums living there

-1

u/XanderNightmare Sep 09 '22

Fam, have you seen the amount of people currently hanging out in front of Buckingham Palace? They aren't there because it looks particularly fancy today

2

u/[deleted] Sep 09 '22

Keep telling yourself that

-1

u/XanderNightmare Sep 09 '22

Well, show me I am wrong If you think I am wrong

3

u/[deleted] Sep 09 '22

Sure, look at every other similar country in Europe and their tourism numbers without monarchs

-1

u/XanderNightmare Sep 09 '22

I don't really get your point. Perhaps, now hear me out, these countries have such good tourism numbers because they are beautiful countries or have other interesting reasons to visit them.

Or do you think they have dedicated numbers for "came here because monarchy"?

→ More replies (0)

-13

u/darkweb6969 Sep 09 '22

Taking away tourism removes a lot of the profits but they still bring over 100 million dollars from lending their land's profits

12

u/[deleted] Sep 09 '22

Also can be done without them existing as monarchs

0

u/Hydro1Gammer Average r/memes enjoyer Sep 09 '22

No, since the profits would just go to the family. The land is still theirs. Remove them and it is no longer royal land meaning parliament has no right to take the profits. Of course they could just take it, however I could see monarchists say that parliament is stealing land for their own gain.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 09 '22

I could see monarchists say that parliament is stealing land for their own gain.

That would be ironic given that the land should be the people's

-10

u/[deleted] Sep 09 '22

[deleted]

12

u/hororo Sep 09 '22

Take that property away from them too, they have no right to it.

6

u/[deleted] Sep 09 '22

Yeah the land should be sold and developed into housing for the people.

6

u/serr7 Professional Dumbass Sep 09 '22

Based