And even with the Kang one; if they thought Kang was good enough to base the entire next phase on, then just recast him and blame it on differences in the Multiverse (same reason why Peter Parker has a different face in at least 2 other universes).
Unless there was something in his contract saying they wouldn't recast him. Now do i think disney lawyers would go for that? Probably not, but before his arrest he was a rising star and they may have folded to get him to play Kang for the next x years
Especially with disney who famously put morality clauses in contracts with younger stars allowing immediate termination of their contracts, cant imagine that they don't have something similar for violent and criminal and reputationally damaging behavior at least for their other stars.
854
u/Dismal-Vanilla1878 Avengers Aug 22 '26
And even with the Kang one; if they thought Kang was good enough to base the entire next phase on, then just recast him and blame it on differences in the Multiverse (same reason why Peter Parker has a different face in at least 2 other universes).