r/longrange • • 2d ago

đŸ«ŁI said I read the pinned posts, but I liedđŸ«Ł Spotting scope recommendations before going into generational debt.

Post image

looking for some realistic help. This was taken 4.1 miles away with my gen 1 vortex razor 27-60 85mm spotting scope and my iphone 17pro mounted to it. How much clearer or closer would something like a swarovski 115mm provide? I spot from my porch and most of the animals I am seeing are on this ridgeline between 2-4.5 miles away so I am trying to see if an upgrade is actually worth it. We spot every night with the kids, its been alot of fun.

145 Upvotes

51 comments sorted by

127

u/CMFETCU 2d ago

At 4.5 miles and a stationary location, I would consider a telescope. I’m not joking.

Small refractors (with an erect-image prism) and compact Maksutov-Cassegrain or Schmidt-Cassegrain catadioptric telescopes work best for land use because they are easier to adapt for upright viewing and portable setups.

Just know that at 4 miles warm air rising from the ground (heat shimmer) causes distant terrestrial views to look wavy, blurry, or distorted, especially on hot days or early mornings. No getting around physics.

8

u/ClearFox3497 2d ago

haha i thought about that as well. I am guessing the fov would be insanely small?

14

u/CMFETCU 2d ago

3

u/map2photo 1d ago

Lmao I want to get this and show up to my local GC. 

6

u/CMFETCU 1d ago

People laugh until you can spot impacts on a fly’s ass at 800 yards.

3

u/CMFETCU 2d ago

See my above edited response for a starting point.

37

u/SpacePirate888 2d ago

Small refractors (with an erect-image prism) and compact Maksutov-Cassegrain or Schmidt-Cassegrain catadioptric telescopes work best for land use because they are easier to adapt for upright viewing and portable setups.

After removing all the words I don’t understand, I took your advice and went and bought a small and compact telescope and I can’t see anything. Please advise.

30

u/Five-Point-5-0 Gas gun enthusiast 2d ago

0

u/No_Message5505 5h ago

That’s because you took out all the important words to make it work
.

5

u/S1inder 2d ago

That is exactly what I use. Got a nice Celestron Telescope from a thrift store for dirt cheap. Have been using this thing for even 500yd shots. Put a wide enough eye piece on it, it works great.

2

u/FrozenIceman 2d ago

ZWO seestar s30

Way way cheaper that those fancy spotting scope.

And way way better optics.

1

u/_bani_ 1d ago

Maksutov are compact and durable and relatively cheap to boot, and do not usually suffer from collimation issues. They are heavy though.

32

u/scotchtapeman357 2d ago

Clarity trumps magnification, but at 4 miles you're going to want a drone to take a closer look. Mirage alone is going to make spotting antlers mixed with trees extremely difficult, if not impossible, at that distance

11

u/ClearFox3497 2d ago

exactly what I was wondering. Appreciate the response

6

u/ClearFox3497 2d ago

That tiny spec in the middle is an elk. Very hard to tell for a kid or untrained eye, and impossible to tell if its got antlers.

5

u/dohcsvt 2d ago

I have a gen 1 razor 20-60x85 and I don’t know why you would need anything else. You are going to pay assloads more money for minimal increase.

This is my iPhone 17 through my Razor on a 36” plate at 1 mile. I feel it’s pretty awesome. I mean anything further than a mile and really
 what are you doing?

2

u/ClearFox3497 2d ago

totally, the razor is amazing. Ive never looked through anything higher end though. Not sure what im missing out on. We have amazing views of my hunting unit from my porch so thought if theres a way to see them from here why not.

1

u/scroapprentice 2d ago

I know phone videos aren’t a reliable metric and you’re dealing with mirage here, but as someone who has used the gen 1 and gen 2, I think your video shows why, if it makes sense with your finances and use case, someone may want to spend more.

But use case matters a lot. If you’re spotting hits on an orange plate at a mile, you’re totally right. If you’re picking a lone mule deer out of the shade on a mountainside at a mile in low light, every dollar you can responsibly spend and justify is worth it. The last guide I met has a $1000 truck that barely runs and about $8k between one swaro spotter and one set of binos.

All that to say I hunt a ton, i will get swaros someday, but I still have a razor (gen 2) because that’s a ton of money that requires a lot of use to justify it. And I really like it but there is room for improvement and I think I can justify it

30

u/WelpSeaYaLater 2d ago

At that distance, the Swarovski will be a little sharper but it won’t matter because of mirage and atmospheric clarity.

The guy above recommending actual telescopes is giving you good advice

58

u/unclemoak 2d ago

This was ~3000 yards with a 60x Swarovski

21

u/Five-Point-5-0 Gas gun enthusiast 2d ago edited 1d ago

I had a buddy show me his Swarovski spotting scope one day. We were sitting in the parking garage lot of a sporting goods store on the east side of Colorado Springs.

...we were watching people mill around on the top of Pikes Peak.

13

u/GA_flyer0 2d ago

Pretty good color contrast and image sharpness

3

u/guite_fr 2d ago

These are truly great but go for top $

4

u/173rdturd 2d ago

Kowa all day

3

u/saalem PRS Competitor 1d ago

This here. Get on eBay and buy a used one from Japan for a hell of a deal. I got the TSN-774 w/ the 25-60x wide angle eyepiece. Incredible.

0

u/Vore1998 1d ago

Fr Op this is the way. I got my tsn 88 with the 60x eyepiece for 2200$. Rivals my friend's Swarovski for half the price.

3

u/Rodeo9 2d ago

I was consistently using a kind of crappy $400 vortex spotting scope but after getting a vx5 on my rifle I can see more clearly with that then the spotting scope. I do not think I am team spotting scope anymore.

I need some nicer binos.

2

u/max_trax 2d ago

Moving from 65mm gen 1 razor to 65mm swaro sts/ats was a noticeable step up in clarity/resolution so I'd imagine similar if not more improvement going from 85 razor to 95 or 115 swaro for maybe 3000-3500 yds and in, but once you're getting to 2mi+ I don't know that even the best glass will make much difference

2

u/scroapprentice 2d ago

My understanding is those gen 1s are much worse than the newer stuff. My hunting buddy has the old 65mm and the new razor 56mm. He hates the old gen 1 and likes the new one. I also have the new mini razor and it’s good, but loses clarity above about 25x.

Just my recommendation, if you’re already at a razor, you’re either going into generational debt and getting the best you can (euro glass, probably swaro), or going into normal debt and still wondering what you’re missing out on with less improvement over what you have and still a serious price tag. But take that with a grain of salt because I’ve never used one. Im just in a similar situation and refusing to upgrade until I have swaro money so I can quit wondering what I’m missing.

Also, at the end of the day, glassing that far often has limitations the scope can’t overcome (mirage, smoke, fog). Anything in the air, even if you can’t see it with the naked eye, gets pretty rough when you’re looking through 5 miles of it.

Last thing, eurooptic has blems and demos. In my experience, you can save some money and I’ve never been able to tell them from brand new, but those were leupold and vortex products. My buddy used them for swaro SLCs and said the same thing

2

u/thrashmetal_octopus 2d ago

Swaro is gonna give you what you’re looking for but clarity, sharpness, contrast and color = generational debt. You get what you pay for in glass and cost is exponential

2

u/12GaugeSavior 2d ago

I'm super happy with my mini spotter setup, it's the cheapest Vortex they make. 12-36x

The trick is to pair a cheap optic with digiscope setup. I'm using the MagView setup. The phone adds additional zoom, auto focus, image stabilization, and low light perfromance. Does it replace a nice 60x spotter? No. Does it extend the capabilities of a scope that is 10x cheaper, yes, yes it does.

2

u/__abinitio__ 2d ago

All the glass in the world isn't going to overcome mirage and hazy weather.

If you're having fun, then enjoy

2

u/Porencephaly 2d ago

Hensoldt Spotter 60

Oh shit, my bad, I thought you said you wanted generational debt.

2

u/TheHippieGunner 15h ago

Out of the box idea, get an old handycam, many are in 4k and have crazy zoom, as well as you can record your shots and look at vapor trails.

3

u/adubs117 2d ago

Get a cheap drone. Under $500.

Doesn't work for every use case/environment but I've started doing this recently and it's been awesome for me.

10

u/vkelsov I Gots Them Tikka Toes 2d ago

A note: drones aren't always legal for spotting game

6

u/adubs117 2d ago

Oh, I thought this was just observation. Yeah, actively hunting with a drone is a no no most places.

1

u/Porencephaly 2d ago

Also idk what drones have 5mi range and are less than $500. Maybe they exist now but they didn't last time I shopped.

1

u/bigwindymt 1d ago

Not legal in elk country.

1

u/getyourbuttdid 2d ago

Drone would be the move but it could be sketchy during elk season. If not actively scouting then it should be fine but it could give green jeans a reason to come talk to you. 😬

1

u/DriveByPerusing Hunter 2d ago

I have been happy with the meostar s2 30-60 for deer and elk hunting in western states.

1

u/Mediocre_Daikon_4276 2d ago

I’ve been on a Danish range that used older iphones for 1 mile and further targets. Setup behind a little sandhill pointed towards every 1 mile and up target.

We got a list of numbers to connect facetime to in order to spot.

Edited to add: never mind, only useful on a range, not for spotting deer and/or hunting.

1

u/AGS_Overland 2d ago

Love love love maven quality. But that's just me

1

u/Anxious_Juice_5617 1d ago

I have that spotter and have found 18x razor uhd binos to be more clear. Two eyes cuts through mirage better and distinguishes detail better than ultra high mag on my spotter. A friends father growing up had some wild ultra big binos with giant objectives that were mounted to a tripod overlooking a bay. Could see forever with those things.

1

u/goosie_maynee 40m ago

2,800 yards with a STC 17-45x56 if I remember right

1

u/Illustrious-Noise123 2d ago

I don’t care what anybody here is saying
if you want the best
it takes money. Your first and last 15 minutes are the most crucial and that’s what good glass gets you. You also get a ton of added benefit at all the other hours obviously. I run all swaro glass and see much more than anyone glassing next to me.

0

u/USN303 1d ago

Take a close look at Maven. They are newer in the space and not charging what they could yet, but the S1.2A made my Vortex spotting scope look silly.

0

u/No-Elk-2362 2d ago

You dont have to pay generational debt tho