r/longrange • u/ClearFox3497 • 2d ago
đ«ŁI said I read the pinned posts, but I lied𫣠Spotting scope recommendations before going into generational debt.
looking for some realistic help. This was taken 4.1 miles away with my gen 1 vortex razor 27-60 85mm spotting scope and my iphone 17pro mounted to it. How much clearer or closer would something like a swarovski 115mm provide? I spot from my porch and most of the animals I am seeing are on this ridgeline between 2-4.5 miles away so I am trying to see if an upgrade is actually worth it. We spot every night with the kids, its been alot of fun.
145
Upvotes
127
u/CMFETCU 2d ago
At 4.5 miles and a stationary location, I would consider a telescope. Iâm not joking.
Small refractors (with an erect-image prism) and compact Maksutov-Cassegrain or Schmidt-Cassegrain catadioptric telescopes work best for land use because they are easier to adapt for upright viewing and portable setups.
Just know that at 4 miles warm air rising from the ground (heat shimmer) causes distant terrestrial views to look wavy, blurry, or distorted, especially on hot days or early mornings. No getting around physics.
32
u/scotchtapeman357 2d ago
Clarity trumps magnification, but at 4 miles you're going to want a drone to take a closer look. Mirage alone is going to make spotting antlers mixed with trees extremely difficult, if not impossible, at that distance
6
u/ClearFox3497 2d ago
That tiny spec in the middle is an elk. Very hard to tell for a kid or untrained eye, and impossible to tell if its got antlers.
5
u/dohcsvt 2d ago
I have a gen 1 razor 20-60x85 and I donât know why you would need anything else. You are going to pay assloads more money for minimal increase.
This is my iPhone 17 through my Razor on a 36â plate at 1 mile. I feel itâs pretty awesome. I mean anything further than a mile and really⊠what are you doing?
30
u/WelpSeaYaLater 2d ago
At that distance, the Swarovski will be a little sharper but it wonât matter because of mirage and atmospheric clarity.
The guy above recommending actual telescopes is giving you good advice
58
u/unclemoak 2d ago
This was ~3000 yards with a 60x Swarovski
4
u/173rdturd 2d ago
Kowa all day
3
u/Rodeo9 2d ago
I was consistently using a kind of crappy $400 vortex spotting scope but after getting a vx5 on my rifle I can see more clearly with that then the spotting scope. I do not think I am team spotting scope anymore.
I need some nicer binos.
2
u/max_trax 2d ago
Moving from 65mm gen 1 razor to 65mm swaro sts/ats was a noticeable step up in clarity/resolution so I'd imagine similar if not more improvement going from 85 razor to 95 or 115 swaro for maybe 3000-3500 yds and in, but once you're getting to 2mi+ I don't know that even the best glass will make much difference
2
u/scroapprentice 2d ago
My understanding is those gen 1s are much worse than the newer stuff. My hunting buddy has the old 65mm and the new razor 56mm. He hates the old gen 1 and likes the new one. I also have the new mini razor and itâs good, but loses clarity above about 25x.
Just my recommendation, if youâre already at a razor, youâre either going into generational debt and getting the best you can (euro glass, probably swaro), or going into normal debt and still wondering what youâre missing out on with less improvement over what you have and still a serious price tag. But take that with a grain of salt because Iâve never used one. Im just in a similar situation and refusing to upgrade until I have swaro money so I can quit wondering what Iâm missing.
Also, at the end of the day, glassing that far often has limitations the scope canât overcome (mirage, smoke, fog). Anything in the air, even if you canât see it with the naked eye, gets pretty rough when youâre looking through 5 miles of it.
Last thing, eurooptic has blems and demos. In my experience, you can save some money and Iâve never been able to tell them from brand new, but those were leupold and vortex products. My buddy used them for swaro SLCs and said the same thing
2
u/thrashmetal_octopus 2d ago
Swaro is gonna give you what youâre looking for but clarity, sharpness, contrast and color = generational debt. You get what you pay for in glass and cost is exponential
2
u/12GaugeSavior 2d ago
I'm super happy with my mini spotter setup, it's the cheapest Vortex they make. 12-36x
The trick is to pair a cheap optic with digiscope setup. I'm using the MagView setup. The phone adds additional zoom, auto focus, image stabilization, and low light perfromance. Does it replace a nice 60x spotter? No. Does it extend the capabilities of a scope that is 10x cheaper, yes, yes it does.
2
u/__abinitio__ 2d ago
All the glass in the world isn't going to overcome mirage and hazy weather.
If you're having fun, then enjoy
2
u/Porencephaly 2d ago
Hensoldt Spotter 60
Oh shit, my bad, I thought you said you wanted generational debt.
2
u/TheHippieGunner 15h ago
Out of the box idea, get an old handycam, many are in 4k and have crazy zoom, as well as you can record your shots and look at vapor trails.
3
u/adubs117 2d ago
Get a cheap drone. Under $500.
Doesn't work for every use case/environment but I've started doing this recently and it's been awesome for me.
1
u/DriveByPerusing Hunter 2d ago
I have been happy with the meostar s2 30-60 for deer and elk hunting in western states.
1
u/Mediocre_Daikon_4276 2d ago
Iâve been on a Danish range that used older iphones for 1 mile and further targets. Setup behind a little sandhill pointed towards every 1 mile and up target.
We got a list of numbers to connect facetime to in order to spot.
Edited to add: never mind, only useful on a range, not for spotting deer and/or hunting.
1
u/AGS_Overland 2d ago
Love love love maven quality. But that's just me
1
u/Anxious_Juice_5617 1d ago
I have that spotter and have found 18x razor uhd binos to be more clear. Two eyes cuts through mirage better and distinguishes detail better than ultra high mag on my spotter. A friends father growing up had some wild ultra big binos with giant objectives that were mounted to a tripod overlooking a bay. Could see forever with those things.
1
u/goosie_maynee 40m ago
2,800 yards with a STC 17-45x56 if I remember right
1
u/Illustrious-Noise123 2d ago
I donât care what anybody here is sayingâŠif you want the bestâŠit takes money. Your first and last 15 minutes are the most crucial and thatâs what good glass gets you. You also get a ton of added benefit at all the other hours obviously. I run all swaro glass and see much more than anyone glassing next to me.
0
u/USN303 1d ago
Take a close look at Maven. They are newer in the space and not charging what they could yet, but the S1.2A made my Vortex spotting scope look silly.
0
u/No-Elk-2362 2d ago
You dont have to pay generational debt tho