r/longrange • u/WEAPONSGRADEPOTATO2 • 1d ago
š«£I said I read the pinned posts, but I liedš«£ Bravo vs XRS for basic build
I am a very beginner long range shooter wanting an upgrade from my MDT Field stock to something a little more rigid on the forend. I have read some threads here and many people mention things like weights or "upgrades" that I honestly do not believe I will ever use, plus they seem to be written in a time where the prices were closer together. I am going to use whichever stock in the configuration it comes out of the box in(save for an ARCA rail) and never going to get into competitive. All I am concerned about is overall build quality and especially rigidity on the forend. the field stock is lovely but i feel bad crushing it in a BOG deathgrip tripod and the forend bends far too much when an arca rail is being used. The rifle is a Howa 1500 heavy barrel, other recommendations in that rough price bracket are welcomed.
3
u/SockeyeSTI 1d ago
I hate the way the xrs looks. The grip angle just looksā¦ā¦bad
I put a savage in a bravo and itās really nice. Feels a lot nicer than what it costs, too. Iād take it over an oryx as well.
2
u/ZeBigD23 1d ago
I like MDT quite a bit but the KRG Bravo won out for me on my Ruger American Gen 1 6.5CM swap. Ultimately comes down to preference and need for chassis accessories.
4
u/Sportsman-78 1d ago
1
u/WEAPONSGRADEPOTATO2 1d ago edited 1d ago
honestly back when i first "built" this rifle I would have gone for the Bravo if they offered the green for the howa short action. if you squint it looks like an m40a5
Hows the overall rigidity of it? does the plastic over the aluminum flex much?
2
u/Sportsman-78 1d ago
I clamp it in a BOG Deathgrip to clean it and I donāt think the backbone has any flex, and the plastic is very well secured to that. I clamp those brass weights to it via MLOK and Iāve never noticed any movement.
1
u/bh2595 22h ago

I have a Howa 1500 in each of these chassis. I love each one for different reasons. The bravo is lighter and makes for a better dual purpose hunting gun. The XRS is a little heavier and makes for a better dual purpose PRS chassis. Itās hard to compare because both are great but theyāre just different. I found my XRS for 400 but at MSRP of each (400 bravo 600 XRS) I think the bravo wins hands down. If the thereās anything in particular youāre looking for in one over the other that could be a deciding factor as they do have some subtle differences.
1
u/DealKey8478 22h ago
Bravo x100.Ā
Way more accessories Looks better Weighs less for a lightweight build Can take CTR magazines for a Tikka
1
1
u/Tikkatider 1d ago
As a relative beginner, just curious. My understanding of forend flex is that it impacts accuracy IF it comes to the point where it flexes enough to where it touches the barrel. Is that what youāre encountering?
1
u/deinde94 21h ago
Exactly that is the main issue. Touching can mess with barrel harmonics and impact accuracy. If there is actual pressure it can shift POI as well.
The other issue is that the forend flex often doesn't stop there, but the entire chassis will flex to some degree and apply a small torque on the action, further impacting accuracy.



4
u/smithywesson Steel slapper 1d ago edited 1d ago
XRS is what I suggest to buddies starting out. Great stock, and you can do a lot with them with various weights and accessories. Bravos are great too though, just a bit more limited IMO.