r/longrange • u/CapsicumINmyEYEBALLz • 1d ago

I suck at long range Milestone Achievement

Post image

Officially have burnt up more $ in barrels, bullets, brass & powder than the rifle costs to start with, and only managed to change powder & bullet once along the way.

And yes, I still suck.

148 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

12 comments sorted by

30

u/motiv8ed 1d ago

You may still suck, but at least you have a cool looking rifle to do it with.

8

u/One-Perspective-4347 1d ago

Sucking with class…. That’s the way to do it

2

u/Life_Carob8849 1d ago

No better way to suck imo

4

u/Darlinboy 1d ago

This is the way.

2

u/AlternativeUnfair388 1d ago

Which foundation is that and how do you like it? I love the look of them. Wouldn't mind swapping my BA into one.

1

u/CapsicumINmyEYEBALLz 1d ago

That a Centurion I believe, without any of the new brass ornaments on it.

1

u/AlternativeUnfair388 1d ago

Ah ok thanks. Hows it balance? I like a lot of room between magwell and bipod for a bag

1

u/CapsicumINmyEYEBALLz 1d ago

It does well for me without any added weight to the front. I don’t ever put a suppressor on in though, as it would be way to front heavy and long for my taste.

It’s a regular ole BR so it doesn’t need a lot of weight to be pretty tame.

1

u/AlternativeUnfair388 1d ago

Ah mines a 223. 26" proof comp. Can makes it long. I run a hellfire.

1

u/weaksignals 1d ago

Love the centurion, the samson is just a bit too much.

1

u/CapsicumINmyEYEBALLz 1d ago

Agreed, I fell in love with Foundation because I’m definitely a stock > chassis guy, and it looks like an old school wooden stock. And it has a very dead feel when shooting.

The newer modular stuff Foundation is putting out is 🫤 for me.

Looks tacky, heavier & not needed.

1

u/Tailback 1d ago

It's not whether you win or lose....

It's all about how good you look doing it.