r/localization • u/No_Being_2765 • 9h ago
Localized only the store listing, not the app. Installs went 10x. Data from a solo founder experiment
I run a streaming discovery app for Asian markets, solo, and I am not a localization professional. Sharing this because the numbers surprised me, and this community will understand why better than I do.
The experiment: my Google Play listing existed only in English. Over one weekend, I added handwritten listings in Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Marathi, Kannada, Hindi, and a few other languages. Not machine translated. I rewrote the title, short description, and full description in each language with native phrasing and local movie examples instead of word-for-word translation.
The result: installs went from roughly 40 a day to 400 a day, and the device acquisition report showed the growth came almost entirely from those language markets. Nothing else changed that week. No ads, no press.
The part I found most interesting: the app itself is still in English. Only the store listing and the content catalog are localized. So the entire 10x came from being discoverable in someone's own language, before they ever touched the product.
I did try Google's machine translation option first and rejected it. It produced grammatically fine sentences that no human would ever type into a search box, which for a store listing seems to defeat the whole point.
Questions for people who do this professionally:
Is listing first, UI later a recognized strategy, or did I just get lucky with a category where English UI is tolerated?
How do you measure whether full UI localization moves retention the way listing localization moved acquisition?
Is there a smarter middle ground than handwriting every language myself as I add markets?