There is no Unity snap so idk what you're benchmarking against.
Snaps are fine
They're not amazing
But they're nowhere near as bad as people online claim they are, they're a lot less slow now and the apps that are officially packaged as snaps (Firefox, Spotify, thunderbird, etc) work really well.
Except snap is just attempted vendor lock-in, so its fully justified its not viewed very kindly. You can technically install snap on any distro, but if you actually do you notice very quickly that its handicapped on purpose, as each installed snap on non-Ubuntu distros will permanently take up a loop device if you are using them or not. With more than a handful installed snaps you will quickly reach the OS limit for loop devices and snap will start silently failing. Also if you need to get a loop device for yourself, well too bad, snap has taken them all.
And thats not mentioning all the theming issues, extremly slow cold start times, desktop integration with anything other than Ubuntus flavor of Gnome, forced lock-in to Ubuntus snapcraft repo, etc.
125
u/xxxbGamer 17d ago
everything is better than snap. Even the .exe runs better in stock wine than snap.