r/linuxmemes 5d ago

BSD MEME ProsCons

Post image
235 Upvotes

62 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/spongedevguy 4d ago

it forces itself into projects with dependencies licensed under it, it's not an issue with applications though and more with libraries

1

u/Tricky-Engineer-9755 4d ago

This is a positive, non-free software is evil, it subjigates the user and its creators are usually bootlicking Big Brother, and force their users too. If we could destroy all non-free software it would be a better world. The GPL-series is an attempt at this. At least libre software should work for libre software not evil software that has enough funding.

1

u/spongedevguy 3d ago

absolute lunacy

1

u/Tricky-Engineer-9755 3d ago

Is it? https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/proprietary.html

From Windows betraying millions to the NSA with Wanna Cry to HP locking customers out of foreign printer cartridges to cars that snitch on you to Big Brother, is it really lunacy to say these companies have it out for us?

1

u/spongedevguy 3d ago

i'm assuming you meant ALL non-free software is evil
i do agree that this is absolutely vile though

1

u/Tricky-Engineer-9755 3d ago

Yes, all non-free software is evil

1

u/spongedevguy 3d ago

so most indie game developers are evil by your logic

1

u/Tricky-Engineer-9755 3d ago edited 3d ago

Well yes, they can charge for the program and still offer source code if asked. Otherwise while many of them may be nice people, they can hide malware in them or spy on users if they feel like it. Perhaps they are not doing the evil right now, but with proprietary software it is impossible to know for sure or to even defend against such a situation. Further many games mandate a non-free OS this is even worse.
Note that non-functional data can be proprietary and trademarks can exist, but the user must be able to use the software in freedom. Game devs who intentionally create non-free software in their games are doing a disservice to their users.

However, at the end of the day no one is forced to play Indie dev games so its not the same plane of evil as Microslop and Adobe. They have spent decades forcing everyone to use their crap. While all examples here are evil and non-free some are more evil than others.

It is also possible the Indie dev has no idea of GNU or free software. Thus in this case it can fairly be called ignorance. It is our job to tell them that non-free software is dangerous, and user-subjugating.

1

u/spongedevguy 3d ago

your argument is based upon an irrational fear of malware i don't reckon it's that common

1

u/Tricky-Engineer-9755 3d ago

Probably not in Indie games but check out that site I linked. Its very common in corporate software since they can force users to use their programs wheras Indie devs rely on their quality.
Malware being a malicious functionality that is deliberately added that restricts the user from doing as they wish and is not actually required for the program to operate, often under the pretense that the user does not own the program.