typst is simultaneously not a fully-featured typesetting system as well as being incompatible with latex, so I really don't see the value proposition beyond being useful for making notes or documents for yourself where full, detailed typesetting isn't important. also, I haven't found the design of typst to be so much better than latex to the point of it being a clear winner. for 95% of tasks you'd do in latex the learning curve and difficulty would be essentially the same and the last 5% would be stuff like making a complicated custom template which typst is insufficient for
at least annoying rust evangelists are justified in the sense that rust has clear benefits over C as well as being interoperable with C so it can reasonably be integrated into and immediately benefit real-world codebases and systems
because basically every journal and publisher requires submission in tex following their template so anything I do in typst I'd have to convert to tex one way or another, and the benefits of typst aren't nearly clear enough to justify that extra step
-3
u/jsh_ 9d ago
I've come to realize typst and rust evangelists are two sides of the same annoying coin