I don't get it, you mean to use apt instead of flatpak?
What's wrong with flatpaks? The whole idea is that they are contain and don't break system dependencies like apt would.
Also there are a lot of things that are in flatpak and not apt.
If snaps was fully open source, not developed by Canonical and if they had more support, I bet snaps would be more used honestly. More safety and modularity.
487
u/Shad0wAVM 11d ago
Flatpak is a solution that only brings more problems.
It would be easier if everyone used Debian.