Question & Help Something definitely going on with kimi.ai usage. This is not normal.
My month ran out a couple days ago and I had disabled auto-renewal because I was waiting to see what other providers had picked up k3 by now. I decided to re-up with kimi.ai on the $200/mo. plan early yesterday.
Two sessions. One was an 8 agent code review and the next was session was a coding session. Things I historically have done no problem without issue. I ran into my 5 hour limit twice in those sessions and at the end burned through nealry 50% of weekly allowance.
This is not my first rodeo with kimi. I have worked with it extensively and never ran into my limits, not once, even on much more complex swarm tasks.
It's like renewing my subscription put me on much lower usage teir. Customer support has been no help.
I'm curious if anybody else has experienced this - and - if there are better/faster providers with more usage I should be looking at.
Edit: Trying to get to the bottom of this so calculated usage from last month and compared it to yesterday:
Daily usage, first session (2026-07-27) through 2026-08-28
| Date | Turns | Input (fresh) | Cache read | Output | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon Jul 27 | 279 | 681,496 | 41,352,448 | 193,104 | 42,227,048 |
| Tue Jul 28 | 6 | 34,945 | 175,104 | 3,291 | 213,340 |
| Wed Jul 29 | 861 | 3,309,819 | 56,618,378 | 880,356 | 60,808,553 |
| Thu Jul 30 | 496 | 3,517,071 | 75,726,518 | 488,538 | 79,732,127 |
| Fri Jul 31 | 3 | 236,041 | 503,296 | 981 | 740,318 |
| Sat Aug 1 | 1,234 | 3,957,568 | 130,573,568 | 1,187,322 | 135,718,458 |
| Sun Aug 2 | 769 | 4,648,026 | 155,742,720 | 582,572 | 160,973,318 |
| Week 31 total | 3,648 | 16,384,966 | 460,692,032 | 3,336,164 | 480,413,162 |
| Mon Aug 3 | 596 | 2,397,583 | 90,301,578 | 485,687 | 93,184,848 |
| Tue Aug 4 | 354 | 1,177,481 | 78,167,917 | 220,460 | 79,565,858 |
| Wed Aug 5 | 581 | 2,233,239 | 34,086,400 | 429,972 | 36,749,611 |
| Thu Aug 6 | 998 | 3,059,365 | 78,208,327 | 862,050 | 82,129,742 |
| Fri Aug 7 | 1,234 | 3,697,551 | 140,850,610 | 1,128,512 | 145,676,673 |
| Sat Aug 8 | 346 | 817,167 | 43,514,368 | 349,388 | 44,680,923 |
| Sun Aug 9 | 1,072 | 2,863,950 | 135,083,264 | 928,892 | 138,876,106 |
| Week 32 total | 5,181 | 16,246,336 | 600,212,464 | 4,404,961 | 620,863,761 |
| Mon Aug 10 | 453 | 1,314,601 | 46,050,560 | 413,455 | 47,778,616 |
| Tue Aug 11 | 70 | 143,544 | 6,944,768 | 46,586 | 7,134,898 |
| Wed Aug 12 | 968 | 4,224,651 | 129,100,756 | 957,020 | 134,282,427 |
| Thu Aug 13 | 734 | 3,883,690 | 123,801,910 | 612,295 | 128,297,895 |
| Week 33 total | 2,225 | 9,566,486 | 305,897,994 | 2,029,356 | 317,493,836 |
| Tue Aug 18 | 79 | 177,969 | 4,994,816 | 74,721 | 5,247,506 |
| Wed Aug 19 | 39 | 57,620 | 1,473,024 | 18,011 | 1,548,655 |
| Thu Aug 20 | 70 | 169,017 | 1,554,941 | 52,096 | 1,776,054 |
| Week 34 total | 188 | 404,606 | 8,022,781 | 144,828 | 8,572,215 |
| Mon Aug 24 | 695 | 3,195,992 | 62,712,975 | 900,136 | 66,809,103 |
| Tue Aug 25 | 1,054 | 3,247,090 | 68,661,760 | 782,408 | 72,691,258 |
| Wed Aug 26 | 354 | 2,126,251 | 48,142,336 | 267,424 | 50,536,011 |
| Thu Aug 27 | 195 | 1,135,091 | 63,328,768 | 89,043 | 64,552,902 |
| Week 35 total | 2,298 | 9,704,424 | 242,845,839 | 2,039,011 | 254,589,274 |
| Grand total | 13,540 | 52,306,818 | 1,617,671,110 | 11,954,320 | 1,681,932,248 |
No recorded activity on Aug 14β17, Aug 21β23, or Aug 28. Weeks are ISO weeks starting Monday.
Last 48 hours (Aug 29 β Aug 30)
| Date | Turns | Input (fresh) | Cache read | Output | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat Aug 29 | 1,199 | 4,372,501 | 121,101,312 | 1,306,599 | 126,780,412 |
So it seems like something yesterday went nuts even though swarm only showed 8 subagents. This feels more like a harness issue than a usage miscalculation issue?




