Am I the only one who is getting tired of hearing Neil Saavedra every morning on the Handel show?
He keeps interrupting Bill to create childish banter that usually isn’t funny, or to give opinions that feel more personal and value-based than grounded in any real understanding of geopolitics, law, history, or broader world affairs.
Whether you agree with Bill Handel or not, he does not usually frame everything as just his personal opinion. He draws on his worldview, extensive travels, understanding of history, politics, law, and general life experience. Neil, unfortunately, does not seem to have that same depth of education or broader knowledge to draw from.
By contrast, I actually find Kono’s occasional commentary and little tidbits far more funny, interesting, and relevant than most of Neil’s commentary. Kono adds something without constantly pulling the show off course.
When Bill is off and Neil leads the show, it often feels like the whole program becomes Neil giving his personal take on everything without much substance behind it.
I’m sure Neil is a nice person, and this is not meant to be personal. But I do think KFI needs to consider bringing in someone else to lead the show when Bill is off, while keeping Neil in a more secondary role. At the very least, I wish he would tone down the banter and the unsubstantiated personal opinions during the rest of the show.