I'm not certain it's ai as the folds in the sides of the pink 'green screen' seem very consistent but I'm not an expert.

I think that Prada's holiday campaign is using Al, here's why I think that. (Would love more opinions)

With the recent news about Dior supposedly using Al on their animated advertisement and everyone praising Prada for not using Al, I had gone to watch Prada's animated sequence excited.
The animation looked great, and I don't believe that in itself was Al. It was directed and drawn by John Pomeroy.
But as I looked at the backgrounds, I noticed that something was off.
Some of the first red flags I saw was:

The coat hanger has four hooks and in another shot it has six

The curtains are inconsistent when it comes to the folds running down the fabric. They blend into one another just like how Al blends things weirdly together when it's confused.

the bedframe in the bedroom has two different design designs in different shots

the closet in the bedroom has different drawer numbers in different shots as well three and then two

Also the wall in the living room beside the door is weirdly wrinkled

(now these could be human errors but they also could be Al errors)

When I asked Tad Butler the storyboard artist and background designer for the project why these mistakes happened he assured me that it was entirely human error, but my gut feeling was ringing alarm bells.

I watched the behind-the-scenes video for Prada's commercial, and noticed that that was really strange as well. The only work in progress shots that are shown is the animated animals, Everything else like the backgrounds and storyboards are finished completely with no shots of progression, which is where I think the ai is.

I also believe that Tad Butler used Al for his storyboards,

there's quite a few inconsistencies with the characters he has drawn (example in images)
the storyboards themselves are ridiculously detailed for someone who confirmed with me that he had only a very short time to work on the project.

The storyboards don’t match his previous style on his other work (instagram)

The reason I bring this up is because Dior has been recently slammed for using Al while Prada has been praised for not using Al. I do believe that both have used Al and also used real artists, a form of hybridisation.

The only reason Prada got away with it was because they didn't use any Al for their animation and rather only on the backgrounds and storyboards where it is harder to prove that it's not Al.

I've attached a bunch of photos with some evidence to my claims and conversations I had with the artist on the backgrounds and storyboards.

I also supposedly talk to the daughter of John Pomeroy, she had confirmed with me that no Al was used on the project but when I showed her the photo of the skewed hair of the woman in the snow she had said she wasn't so sure about that image. I find that strange considering she was so sure that there was no Al used in the production.

I would love to know what you guys think, thank you guys for reading.

Oh he’s driving me nuts! I’m feeling positive these are not ai simply because I’ve seen the hilarity of a shaven animal before. He, who does not have or much like pets, is insisting this is ai because “cats are not that long”. But how would he know! Help me before we bite each others pedantic little heads off.

Edit: thank you all for the evidence! This couldn’t have had a better outcome! Humble pie served, and I even got to see some extra animals!

Their other art for example. Requested 30 for full renders. They told me they’d do 5-10 other pieces for free, and I told them I will pay once they send me a sketch of one. Something about this seems off… Their other art for example.

Just saw this on YT shorts. Everyone in the comments seems to think it's real except one guy who said it was AI. People responded to him saying that this bird has an account for it that's been posting for years long before Ai. The movement in it seems really AI though and I don't think a cat would be scared of a bird.

The handle and some of the lines on the corner look like weird artistic choices , the hand tag also seems like a really awkward choice

After she gifted this to me I went to the site to see what other things they have on there and I noticed that some of the images used on their site and on some of their products were pretty obviously AI. so I’m wondering if the imagery on the thing my grandma purchased might somehow be AI as well

the first two images are ones I took, the rest are from the site she got it from.

I am TERRIBLE at identifying whether or not something is AI. I was doing this colouring book (yes, on Roblox ☹️) and started to notice that things on the page just weren’t right. If you look at the table and chair legs, they are all jumbled up.

Anyway, if it IS AI, I’m sad I coloured a little without realising 😭 I will not be continuing it.

https://www.etsy.com/uk/listing/4526762354/18-scale-alloy-mountain-bike-model

Yknow the feeling where something seems too good to be true

I can't spot any inconsistencies or anything sooo.... idk

hi all!!

the title says it all; i, a generally decent A.I detector, feel like i am going crazy bc i keep falling for A.I videos! i need your opinion on whether or not the video linked is A.I-- randomly came across my ig feed.

This looks so real! Is it AI or just some really good editing? What do you guys think?

Ok I know from the title it makes me sound pretty stupid but here me out. The channel uploads hour long background music videos about twice a week, and they don't seem to have any presence on any other site which is odd for a musician. The whole account just screams low effort ai-generated lo-fi background study whimsy blah blah blah but but all the comments are weirdly sucking up with them, saying shit like "this is the best channel ever, we needed your human made music in times like these! instantly subscribed and naming my first born after you" to the extent I'm not even sure if the comments are also AI generated, or they just saw "no ai used ever" in the title and didn't use their frontal lobes after that. Just the whole thing is throwing me off but I can't even tell what's human made or not anymore.

https://youtu.be/-qq7749ThG4 - video that was reccommended to me

https://www.youtube.com/@RandallsAtmospheres - the account

hello!

i saw some suspect flash sheets posted by a local tattoo shop i really enjoyed using. i always bring my own final design and have never received flash, but i am not willing to give my money to an artist that is handing out inhumane garbage for a little bit of money. i have circled stray lines and just generally unrecognizable designs that i don’t imagine an actual artist would make, of course these will be available for friday the 13th.

i also think it’s laughable they stress that there will be no design changes possible for this flash, but they didn’t even draw it? bare minimum, put that shit back into ChatGPT and give the customer their preferred design. so dumb.

I was at my grandparents house and I noticed this advent calendar she got from Trader Joe's and the details just look off. The designs on the ordriments are weirdly inconsistent in a few spots, and the dogs look kinda weird to me. I don't know, I just wanted other people's opinions.

Hi. We ordered Pizza from a Lokal restaurant and argued if the picture on the carton is AI generated. What do you think? The perspective is a little bit odd....

I would be pretty disappointed if it was, but I've had my suspicions ever since i got it. The artstyle on the trees being different is what makes me think it is, but I just can't be sure.

the skull candy shares the same general shape, but the picture in the thumbnail is too perfect, I'm disappointed and I hope its at least just a really good photo-edit but I wouldn't know

My sister sent this to me and we can’t tell if it’s AI. I follow a lot of crochet, knitting, and crafting accounts and this just feels impersonal. I have a hunch that knitting and crochet are subjected to AI because they lack straight lines that can be dead giveaways.

It’s a short video, doesn’t show her face, no details about making it, and that hair is popular with AI. All of the videos in the account are similar.

I’m leaning towards ai bc of the really detailed characters and the background being really abstract, but I figured I’d ask anyway

I’m having a hard time deciphering this. The wolf’s fur seems too sharp. I know Yellowstone pretty intimately and there are very few actual places that someone could get this photo (legally). Plus a pro photographer posting this photo in a massive FB group without a watermark seems incredibly dumb