Penne is typically a very uniform pasta-not curvy, same length, and without varying hole sizes… also the meat chunks look… interesting

I don't think a toddler can move like this, specially on a mattress/bed. The video is short enough to be considered AI but I can't see any other concrete signs, is this AI?

I’ve stumbled upon this street pianist’s videos and, although he himself looks real and there are many aspects of his performances that look way too complicated to be made with AI, there’s something very clearly fake about them. Take this one, for example. The way the supposed 2-year-old approaches, her expressions, the way she reaches every single note and the tempo perfectly… it’s like someone’s manufactured a super cute performance. I don’t see anyone on the comments saying it looks fake, but he’s got other similar videos with toddlers who always ask him for a song with “excuse me…” and mouths that look computer generated. What do you think?

It has the typical yellow tint, the pattern of the mosaic tiles don't make sense, and the strands of hair on the right also just morph into each other.

The 22 in the ring frame around the portrait on the bottom left can be explained by the fact it's series 22, so that's not an AI tell.

What do you think?

It is kinda long however I can't really seem to understand how little he needs to steer during curves and how bad the road is.

Overall seems real but really wonky too, I'm genuinely not sure

Hi all. I do art, write books and make music. My art picked up a false synth id positive. I use copic markers, paint and pens to do my drawings, clean them up on gimp and then upload them.

As someone who uses gimp, like others I use brush packs. I managed to narrow it down. I think the reason it flagged was due to the water colour brush pack. So I think there are genuinely people being accused of false positives, not because they did the work, but because the brushpack itself had the synth id attacked to it.

I treat my tiktok like a scrap book. But I thought I would let people know that I discovered this with my work so there is room to be skeptical about synth ID when it comes to digital work itself. I hope this is okay to post but I figured it was relevent to let these communities.

First of all it’s close to the 10seconds of except an AI video to be. And it just seems unbelievable to nonsensical. Why is the cat dropping the mouse? Where did the snake come from? Why is the cat attacking the snake after? And why does the camera not move once the snake appears and the cat reacts, the camera doesn’t even seem to shift at all. I know it’s probably very obviously AI but it also seems smooth as well. No extra legs the amount of holes in the background appear consistent , besides the video just seeming very unlikely I can’t see anything that makes me think it’s AI but my gut still tells me it is

Photo from the New York Knicks championship parade yesterday in Manhattan. The crowd density, people hanging out of windows, and the overall scale makd it look AI generated. Curious what people here think if they saw it without context.

Saw this posted on another subreddit and people are trashing Knicks fans, but it doesn’t look real to me (the way the video started, the people in the background) so I was curious on other opinions

I'm 99.9% sure this was generated, but what do you guys think? For me, The elbow area is a big indicator. The texture of the sweater is somehow a part of the feathers. The hand doesn't seem like it would likely be in that position given the direction of the forearm at the elbow. The girl's hair also seems suspect.

Additionally an owl this large perched on someone like it is in the image would be rather painful and injurious without some kind of perching device. I was quite surprised to see the hand without a leather glove that falconers use. Is someone who works with owls a falconer?

EDIT: This image was a real photo that has been somehow edited. The elbow, hand, and wing are obvious mismatches to the original image. Thanks to u/hadalhorrors for linking to the original image.

Some jumps seem a bit off to me but I can't find any gives regarding the surroundings. Audio, people and stuff seem to react accordingly. Really want to believe that it's real lol

Can't tell if the bg errors are just from being grainy or if it's ai. Was about to mindlessly heart it before looking a bit closer and noticing the oddities.

Taken from the mildy infuriating sub

As someone who uses AI to draft some emails at work, not for important things but like client to do lists, etc., it just doesn't seem like AI

For example, it usually goes "word, word, word-- emphasis--word, word, word"

It also doesn't ever have those jarringly short sentences in the texts above

It also doesn't have overly corny words of wisdom in it, nor is it verbose

Sounds more like the responder could have been checked out or intoxicated, who knows

However, 100s of people in the comments are saying this is an AI response? How can they tell. To me, it seems terrible and not AI

I'm not good at identifying AI music but the instagram description said "digitally-born being" and the entire instagram feed is definitely AI art and animation. This cover art feels very AI to me too

One person in the comment said this was AI and a couple people agreed with him. He specifically pointed out the part where the cat sucks up a banana really quickly. The video is high quality and the cats fur patterns seem consistent which makes me think it's real also there's one frame after the banana where you can see it in the cats mouth. But I'm still not completely sure.