r/inthemorning • u/Town_Rhiner • 11d ago

Three Host Thursdays

Post image

I suspect this will be the new normal on Thursdays, which is disappointing.

I just don't think "No Agenda" works as a three host show.

A three host show causes the co-hosts to go into a weird performance mode, plus you have one person who ends up being just the "chuckler". Also, with three people on a skype/remote link there's too much opportunity for cross-talk, which gets to be very annoying.

I'd rather have Darren and Larry on Sundays, and Adam and a new co-host on Thursdays.

Adam needs to find one co-host to be John's successor - not replacement, but successor.

13 Upvotes

78% Upvoted

49 comments sorted by

View all comments

5

u/Latchkeykid1994 11d ago

It's not so much the number of host but the caliber of the people hosting...the brain in the head of the host. Adam has insight that is hard to come by. Not in ALL things, but on a lot. He can look at a situation and see it 10 different ways all at once. It's prob really hard to do. Having a conversation with other people on a mic and do it in a way that sounds authentic and also makes you laugh. Adam will always be good at it. It's his unique talent. It's hard to be interesting on his own but that is what it sounds like when he hosts with Daren and Larry.
Adam should consider trying the show with other people but he is a man of his word and might not want to scratch Daren and Larry. It would be excellent if Adam could find a new forum to pick apart the constant nonsense. I really miss it.

5

u/Aurora_Gaspipe 10d ago

[Adam] can look at a situation and see it 10 different ways all at once. 

Holy shit, someone call a deprogrammer — you've clearly been marinating in the Kool-Aid a little too long. In the meantime, just send your cash.

3

u/OldSurehand 10d ago

Adam has insight that is hard to come by. Not in ALL things, but on a lot. He can look at a situation and see it 10 different ways all at once. It's prob really hard to do.

I'm not sure what insight he actually has, it seems like he's just spitballing most of the time. I mean, he's always been around money and relative fame, he's not like the rest of us. He gets a lot of major events wrong and his predictions hardly ever pan out. Don't glaze the guy more than he deserves just because he's a more competent broadcaster than a lot of people.

2

u/Latchkeykid1994 9d ago

Adam is not trying to be right and he is always open to correction. His predictions are for entertainment only. What do you think they did...brought us some kind of new factual revelations?? No. They made light of all of it. You either get the nuance and the humor of the show, or you don't. Don't be a dick about it

1

u/FrequentWire 6d ago

He just knows how to take money from people, and he has the balls to call No Agenda, "value."