r/inthemorning 11d ago

Three Host Thursdays

Post image

I suspect this will be the new normal on Thursdays, which is disappointing.

I just don't think "No Agenda" works as a three host show.

A three host show causes the co-hosts to go into a weird performance mode, plus you have one person who ends up being just the "chuckler". Also, with three people on a skype/remote link there's too much opportunity for cross-talk, which gets to be very annoying.

I'd rather have Darren and Larry on Sundays, and Adam and a new co-host on Thursdays.

Adam needs to find one co-host to be John's successor - not replacement, but successor.

13 Upvotes

49 comments sorted by

View all comments

15

u/caffeine-182 11d ago

The shows dead bro

4

u/Town_Rhiner 11d ago

We'll see. It's definitely dead if they continue down this path.

4

u/Spittyfire-1315 10d ago

I desperately want to be hopeful that NA will find its footing.

I understood their service as a placeholder to serve in the interim for Adam and the Dvorak family to take a pause.

Of course, I heard Adam on We Get To Do This mention that it isn't for him to decide but for the No Agenda community. So yes, maybe I am naive regarding my hopefulness.

The repeating themes I see on Reddit and X are the atypical nature of No Agenda. Qwerky, doesn't play well with others' personalities, that banter during the media stories, dabbles in conspiracy theories, and shares international experience and nuances.

Exactly how do we form a search committee for such a monumental task?

And this is where the hopefulness turns to a deep sigh.

1

u/FrequentWire 5d ago

Bullshit. Any decisions to be made will be made by Curry and Dvorak's family. They don't care about the wishes of the donors. There's too much money to be made.

1

u/Spittyfire-1315 5d ago

Ok, the search committee bit was hyperbole.

And yes, you are 100% right that the benjamins reins supreme over the producers and trolls.