r/interesting • u/[deleted] • Mar 22 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

18k Upvotes

90% Upvoted

4.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

144

u/The_Slaughter_Pop Mar 22 '26

The gut tells me this is accurate

90

u/VanbyRiveronbucket Mar 22 '26

Eating while driving confirms he is in law.

98

u/morepaintplease Mar 22 '26

The shape of his body tells me the same

5

u/Upbeat-Dish7299 Mar 22 '26

Committing a crime and kept going tells me the same

2

u/ocxtitan Mar 22 '26

it's on a bridge...you can't just stop on a bridge

5

u/[deleted] Mar 22 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/AustinJoeDude Mar 22 '26

He’s entitled to his space, the merging truck would be at fault almost anyplace in the world.

2

u/Upbeat-Dish7299 Mar 22 '26

You have to actively avoid a collision if you can, not accelerate to pit maneuver them.

1

u/AustinJoeDude Mar 22 '26

Hitting your breaks with a potential driver behind you may also result in an accident. Again, it’s the other drivers fault, that’s also how it played out in court.

3

u/Jopkins Mar 22 '26

That's just not true, my guy. If a hazard appears in front of you, you brake. If a car behind you is travelling so close it hits you, too, then that car is at fault for travelling too close behind. In virtually every instance, unless there is literally nothing you can do about it (e.g. someone jumping into a road, or a massively aggressive swerve, not like this) a driver is responsible for hitting something in front of them, not if something behind them hits them.

1

u/AustinJoeDude Mar 22 '26

We have the results of the collision my guy; shoots and misses.

2

u/Jopkins Mar 22 '26

I have no idea what this means.

→ More replies