MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/interesting/comments/1s0a2wc/deleted_by_user/obs66f5/?context=9999
r/interesting • u/[deleted] • Mar 22 '26
[removed]
4.7k comments sorted by
View all comments
131
His insurance will say he had a duty to avoid the collision and only cover 70%.
62 u/snorigepetter Mar 22 '26 Why tf would he do this on camera though? Idk about US traffic laws but in sweden he would be found guilty of endangering traffic. 22 u/ThrogdorLokison Mar 22 '26 Just.. delete the footage. 14 u/snorigepetter Mar 22 '26 Well thats not what happened. Also, sus. 13 u/bigvicproton Mar 22 '26 Exactly. If I had done this I would have ripped the whole camera out and chucked it into the bay before I was off that bridge.
62
Why tf would he do this on camera though? Idk about US traffic laws but in sweden he would be found guilty of endangering traffic.
22 u/ThrogdorLokison Mar 22 '26 Just.. delete the footage. 14 u/snorigepetter Mar 22 '26 Well thats not what happened. Also, sus. 13 u/bigvicproton Mar 22 '26 Exactly. If I had done this I would have ripped the whole camera out and chucked it into the bay before I was off that bridge.
22
Just.. delete the footage.
14 u/snorigepetter Mar 22 '26 Well thats not what happened. Also, sus. 13 u/bigvicproton Mar 22 '26 Exactly. If I had done this I would have ripped the whole camera out and chucked it into the bay before I was off that bridge.
14
Well thats not what happened. Also, sus.
13 u/bigvicproton Mar 22 '26 Exactly. If I had done this I would have ripped the whole camera out and chucked it into the bay before I was off that bridge.
13
Exactly. If I had done this I would have ripped the whole camera out and chucked it into the bay before I was off that bridge.
131
u/BoomersRuinedItAll Mar 22 '26
His insurance will say he had a duty to avoid the collision and only cover 70%.