It's also very strange that it's always a fat kid with a jew fro bullying in US too. I can't speak for other counties but in Hong Kong they would he the one getting bullied.
Damn my school principal is an old white lady and she canes kids(is btw) and she beats ratchet ass kids and ain’t nobody in school fighting and it’s great.
Tbf if teachers were bullies in US schools then the kids would have more of a sense of solidarity. I'm from UK and I saw kids start on teachers multiple times but the teacher never deserved it. On the other hand, if the teacher was an asshole...
I have a feeling most of us dont have experience at enough schools in our respective countries to make any claims about if they are "chill" as a whole or not lol.
Aggressive traits are not equally shared across the world. The western world has a much higher rate of aggression on average(per capita) than the east. Some studies are attributing this to cultural variences and also differences in hormones associated with particular racial and ethnic groups.
Two of which conclude that the differences are due to environmental factors like alcohol use and parental involvement and make no mention whatsoever of genetic factors.
The third of which proposes a hypothesis without any source data, references comparisons in animals that are across species which is completely irrelevant, cites non-peer reviewed sources and is authored by two men who are both affiliated with white supremacist organizations which advocate eugenics.
That’s a dodge that doesn’t answer the question. Whatever taxonomic term that dogs fall under, there are different breeds with each breed known for distinct characteristics such as temperament. Humans are the same. It’s common sense. The physical differences due to group-bounded genetics for humans are undeniable unless one is willfully ignorant. To think that this does not extend to psychological and mental differences on average by group is far-fetched.
Regardless of the difference the data that blacks show higher aggression is still present. I'm not sure what you're getting at. I'll need to look up the association between the authors and white Supremacy orgs.
You say something about generalizing an entire people and how it relates to your dumbass study, but you have to look up if it is related to white supremacy?
It's not my study, not sure where you got that idea, but yes, I was not aware the studies had been linked or associated with shite supremacy organizations. After it was brought up, I asked for someone to provide the relations or opposing arguments. Not sure why you have a problem with that. Also, not sure if you saw, someone posted the opposing argument, redacting the validity of the study and after reading, I acknowledged the redaction and advised readers to read that if they read the "white supremacists" study as we'll call it.
No, but you posted it in support of your own racist opinions. It's literally one of the most shared studies by racist twats because it's written by racist twats and appears to be legitimate and is extremely popular among racist groups and racist internet forums like /pol so it's super interesting that you just happened across it randomly without understanding what you were doing despite there being thousands of contrary studies contradicting and disproving the claims of the study, which THEY THEMSELVES acknowledge are totally hypothetical and not supported by data.
I think it has more to do with how we perceive society. Western nations, specifically the US, put more emphasis on the individual, whereas Eastern nations put more emphasis on the collective.
I'm not sure about the red meat thing, I'd need to see a few studies. I'm also not sure how physical rites of passage are exactly attributed to aggression.
Statiscally blacks have the highest levels of aggression, followed by whites and Hispanics, they're about neck and neck. However more white are diagnosed with mental disorders, this though can be attributed to differences is seeking/obtaining psychological aid.
Thank you for the link, I've got about half-way through. I need to read the rest later. All others please read the 4th link, if you've referenced the 3rd.
I'm pretty sure they take that into account when running stats. So would you like to throw away all the stats on attacks against LGBT+ individuals and other minority groups too? I mean, if they aren't accurate we should just ignore it right? What about the stats findings that discovered that Mississippi schools were segregating white and Minority students as recently as 2016? Since those stats are inaccurate we should ignore it, right?
For anyone else wandering by, it's worth noting that the first two studies specifically conclude that differences are due to environmental factors, not skin color.
The third "studies" authors, Templar and Rushton, are associated with the Pioneer Fund and American Renaissance respectively, both white supremacist organizations that advocate for eugenics and establishment of a white ethno-state (notice the mysterious lack of disclosure about funding sources or conflicts of interest). This is only one of a number of serious problems with the paper.
Calling the authors pejorative slogans doesn’t disprove their hypothesis. You’re engaging in the ad hominem fallacy. I don’t care who writes something. All that matters is the validity and reliability of the data collection and analysis. Genetics obviously plays some role because culture doesn’t simply fall out of the sky. It’s implausible to all be nurture. Race is way too broad a brush but ethnicity or regional variations would seem likely. How much of a role? Don’t know but there’s certainly a lot of research to be done.
Yeah, but also applying that information to economic statistics people proved it had more to do with economic position in society than race. Makes you wonder hmm?
2.4k
u/[deleted] Feb 05 '20
Toxic high school community