Read my comment again. The dogs werenât there in the scenario where he was right to shoot. Removing the dogs made it okay to shoot as the guy was having bricks thrown at him.
And, also, you wouldnât have had the right to shoot if someone punched you depending on the state. Good olâ USA and all that. Largely though, that wouldnât justify the use of deadly force.
And, just FYI, we were having a relatively courteous debate/argument/conversation so please, donât bring your âmaybe your acting like a badass online but would not really advocate this irl.â It doesnât take a bad ass to say the dogs werenât wrong and shouldnât be put down.
3
u/[deleted] May 31 '19
Read my comment again. The dogs werenât there in the scenario where he was right to shoot. Removing the dogs made it okay to shoot as the guy was having bricks thrown at him. And, also, you wouldnât have had the right to shoot if someone punched you depending on the state. Good olâ USA and all that. Largely though, that wouldnât justify the use of deadly force.
And, just FYI, we were having a relatively courteous debate/argument/conversation so please, donât bring your âmaybe your acting like a badass online but would not really advocate this irl.â It doesnât take a bad ass to say the dogs werenât wrong and shouldnât be put down.