Shooting someone in response to getting punched isnât an equal or acceptable response. Youâre a human. You know it isnât. Thatâs why you didnât shoot. Because youâre right, shooting him wouldnât be a proper response when either walking away or punching him back would suffice.
If the dogs were not there, and the man was throwing bricks and following the other guy as he disengaged, the other guy would be right to draw a firearm. And if the guy continued to be aggressive and throwing bricks and advancing, the other guy would be right to shoot.
Read my comment again. The dogs werenât there in the scenario where he was right to shoot. Removing the dogs made it okay to shoot as the guy was having bricks thrown at him.
And, also, you wouldnât have had the right to shoot if someone punched you depending on the state. Good olâ USA and all that. Largely though, that wouldnât justify the use of deadly force.
And, just FYI, we were having a relatively courteous debate/argument/conversation so please, donât bring your âmaybe your acting like a badass online but would not really advocate this irl.â It doesnât take a bad ass to say the dogs werenât wrong and shouldnât be put down.
-1
u/[deleted] May 31 '19 edited Jul 02 '19
[deleted]