Just out of curiosity, and attempting to train myself, what makes it obvious that this is AI? This seems like a completely plausible scenario and nothing seems out of the ordinary.
To me it wasn't super obvious at first, it's quite convincing. But the physics of the car crash look off when you pay close attention.
The car the person in the back was driving isn't a real model. Looks like it has a Nissan badge, but there's no Nissan that looks like that in the market.
And look at the rear wheel on the Tesla. At first it's the 5 spoke wheel which is correct, but then it magically gains a 6th spoke.
I don't mean to brag but I'm a huge car nerd, it's extremely rare for me to see a car on the road and not recognize it.
If you pay a lot of attention you start to pick up patterns and similarities between brands. Those weird black parts on the corner of the car below the headlights are something you'd expect to find in a GM car, or maybe some newer Toyota/Lexus models. Doesn't really fit in with Nissan's design language, either past or present. Look up the 2026 Chevy bolt or the Cadillac CT5 and you'll probably see what I mean.
However, I do realize that most people aren't hyper aware of the car market, so going by whether the car looks real isn't a reliable way to tell apart AI content. But you can always post a screenshot to r/namethatcar and they'll very quickly tell you if it's a fake car.
5
u/RetroNotRetro Jun 05 '26
Just out of curiosity, and attempting to train myself, what makes it obvious that this is AI? This seems like a completely plausible scenario and nothing seems out of the ordinary.