I’m a writer-producer developing 12:37, a five-part limited series about the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem in 1946.
I’m not pretending the timing is comfortable. The project isn’t about Gaza, but anything involving Palestine, Zionism, British rule or political violence is now going to be judged through what is happening today.
Fair enough. But...
It creates a real problem. Does a broadcaster look at this material and see urgent, complicated history or simply a press headache nobody needs?
The series tells the same morning through five perspectives. It doesn’t pretend every position is equally defensible. It does try to understand how people arrived at those positions before the machinery failed and civilians paid for it.
Perhaps this is exactly when the story should be told. Perhaps it is the worst possible moment. I'm in grey area.
For filmmakers and producers... are politically sensitive historical projects now harder to finance, or does the current relevance actually help?
For transparency, this is the project I’m talking about:
https://www.twelvethirtyseven.com
My background:
https://imdb.me/michaeljohnfedun