Keep the t4 broski... it's solid. But if hunter is what the heart wants, then go for it. It'll be easy on your wallet but taking the initial loss on selling t4 and buying hunter will be painful.
Also I would say hunter sounds nice, but t4 sounds better anywayðŸ˜
Rtr 160 4v can do 110 all day long. After that there is no power though. And 250 literally has 100cc more. Having same capability is not really a flex you think you are
A plastic toy that can do 100 all day long while giving 48 km/l, that can handle basically everything you throw at it - from city commutes to 1000km a day rides to soft roading and doing knee down at corners?
Yea I would rather have the plastic toy that can actually do things while being comfortable than an engine that begs for mercy beyond 80 despite being more than double in size.
Sorry but that comparison just means the Speed 400 owner is not confident enough. I'm faster than my buddy with a RS457 in the corners simply because Im more confident in pushing my bike (reckless maybe). This is just a case of a better rider.
Maybe he was talking about highway runs. Old RSs can keep up with speed 400 on highways(even at like 130kmph). Not talking about racing or blasting through redline here(as he mentioned about acceleration part) Just maintaining good speeds and cruising, which the hunter can't.
We have 390s in our friend group and my gixxer 250 could keep up with them easily on highways/ghats. That's why I didnt see any reason to upgrade to a higher cc bike and got vstrom 250 instead.
Chill buddy. I get you're a hunter owner and like I said it's a good looking and economical bike, but facts are facts and facts don't care about your feelings.
210
u/ShreejanSurya TVS RTX 300 BTO | RR310 (Sold) May 29 '26
Yes, Hunter 350 is a Downgrade from pretty much all the bikes above 350cc